Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Abnorm Psychol. 2011 Aug;120(3):543–556. doi: 10.1037/a0023159

Table 3.

Fit Indices for Measurement Invariance (MI) Models

Model χ2 (df) Δχ2 CFI ΔCFIa NCI ΔNCI ΔNCI Criteriaa
Heavy drinking .0072
 Unconstrained 255.20 (24) - .982 - 1.0840 -
Weak MI 278.95 (28) 23.75* .980 .002 1.0912 .0072
 Strong MI 459.19 (33) 180.24* .966 .014 1.1603 .0688
 Strict MI 546.71 (39) 87.52* .959 .007 1.1938 .0334
Sensation Seeking .0062
 Unconstrained 175.33 (8) - .943 - 1.0601 -
 Weak MI 176.30 (10) 0.97 .943 .000 1.0597 .0004
 Strong MI 183.43 (12) 7.13* .941 .002 1.0616 .0019
Strict MI 188.20 (15) 4.77 .941 .000 1.0622 .0006
Impulsivity .0062
 Unconstrained 74.23 (8) - .973 - 1.0233 -
 Weak MI 74.71 (10) 0.48 .974 .001 1.0228 .0005
Strong MI 75.95 (12) 1.24 .974 .000 1.0225 .0002
 Strict MI 85.25 (15) 9.30* .971 .003 1.0248 .002
Autonomy .0062
 Unconstrained 200.93 (8) - .955 - 1.0696 -
 Weak MI 203.64 (10) 2.71 .955 .000 1.0698 .0002
 Strong MI 206.84 (12) 3.20 .955 .000 1.0703 .0005
Strict MI 219.00 (15) 12.16* .953 .002 1.0737 .0034

Note. Rows in bold indicate the selected measurement invariance models for each construct. CFI = Comparative fit index; NCI = McDonald’s noncentrality index.

a

The minimum criteria for change in model fit indicated by the CFI (.002) and NCI were taken from Meade and colleagues (2008).

*

p < .05.