Table 5.

Age, sex and ethnic adjusted risks for PUD and GC in relation to H. pylori genotypes

	PUD (n = 22) vs NUD (n = 91)			GC (n = 11) vs NUD (n = 91)
	OR	95% CI	P value	OR	95% CI	P value
cagA+ vscagA−	0.42	0.16–1.11	0.08	0.30	0.07–1.24	0.10
cagE+ vscagE−	0.85	0.31–2.30	0.74	0.27	0.05–1.43	0.12
vacA s1 vs s2	1.86	0.69–5.01	0.22	0.55	0.10–2.96	0.49
vacA m1 vs m2	1.12	0.40–3.20	0.83	0.58	0.15–2.22	0.42
oipA+ vsoipA−	0.53	0.20–1.41	0.20	0.10	0.01–0.84	0.03

When calculating the risk for GC vs NUD, ethnic information was not included, as there are no GC cases in other ethnic groups.

cagA+, cagA–positive; cagA−, cagA–negative; cagE+, cagE–positive; cagE−, cagE–negative; oipA+, oipA–positive; oipA−, oipA–negative.

CI, confidence interval; GC, gastric carcinoma; NUD, non-ulcer dyspepsia; OR, odds ratio adjusted by age and sex; PUD, peptic ulcer disease.