Skip to main content
. 2010 Jun 25;19(8):1217–1225. doi: 10.1007/s00520-010-0941-7

Table 2.

Complete response (defined as no emetic episodes and no use of rescue medication) rates in the study cohorts

Complete responses
Palo plus 1-day Dexa (n (%)) Palo plus 3-day Dex (n (%)) Difference between groupsb (95% CI), % P c
ITT cohortd, n = 332 n = 166 n = 166
 Acute phase (0–24 h) 147 (88.6) 140 (84.3) 4.2 (−3.1 to 11.6) 0.262
 95% CI 82.7 to 92.9 77.9 to 89.5
 Delayed phase (24–120 h) 114 (68.7) 129 (77.7) −9.0 (−18.5 to 0.4) 0.116
 95% CI 61.0 to 75.6 70.6 to 83.8
 Overall phasee (0–120 h) 112 (67.5) 118 (71.1) −3.6 (−13.5 to 6.3) ND
 95% CI 59.8 to 74.5 63.6 to 77.9
PP cohortf, n = 324 (n = 163) (n = 161)
 Acute phase (0–24 h) 144 (88.3) 135 (83.9) 4.5 (−3 to 12) 0.242
 95% CI 82.4 to 92.8 77.2 to 89.2
 Delayed phase (24–120 h) 112 (68.7) 124 (77.0) −8.3 (−17.9 to 1.3) 0.093
 95% CI 60.9 to 75.7 69.7 to 83.3
 Overall phasee (0–120 h) 109 (66.9) 113 (70.2) −3.3 (−13.4 to 6.8) ND
 95% CI 59.1 to 74.0 62.5 to 77.1

ND not done

aPalonosetron plus dexamethasone

b1-day minus 3-day regimen with 95% confidence interval obtained using normal approximation of binomial data

cTwo-sided chi-square test (1-day vs. 3-day)

dIntention-to-treat

eNon-inferiority hypothesis in primary analysis was proven as the lower boundaries of the 95% CI of between-group difference were greater than the preset threshold (−15%)

fPer-protocol cohort