Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Ann Surg. 2011 Mar;253(3):502–507. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318203a289

TABLE 1.

High–Low-ED Contrast, Pre > Post.

Coordinates (x,y,z) Area(s) k Minimum t value
32, 36, 6 Inferior frontal gyrus (dlPFC)* 253 (333) 2.59
−20, −64, 30 Precuneus* 234 (144) 2.81
30, 42, 30 dlPFC* 121 (333) 2.25
28, 22, 32 47 2.32
−6, 2, 36 Dorsal cingulate* 115 (179) 2.51
−12, 2, −6 Lentiform nucleus* 90 (137) 2.30
8, 2, −4 Ventral striatum* 2.17
8, 58, 16 dmPFC 83 2.47
−36, −46, 42 Inferior parietal lobe 80 2.28
50, −38, 52 36 2.17
−62, −12, 38 Precentral gyrus 43 2.31
−56, −2, 14 24 2.14
8, −52, 14 Posterior cingulate 42 2.07
−30, −58, 60 Superior parietal lobe 42 1.96
20, 38, 22 Anterior cingulate 37 2.47
−8, 32, 30 28 2.09
−14, −22, 4 Thalamus 30 2.37
34, −70, 6 Middle occipital gyrus 26 2.36
*

Significant at P < 0.05 corrected, when tested against the global null hypothesis (see the “Methods” section).

Areas showing a postsurgical reduction in the difference between conjoint activation in response to high-ED and low-ED foods. Italic values (in parentheses) indicate cluster size when threshold at P < 0.005 was applied, testing against the global null hypothesis. Among these clusters, those larger than 135 voxels were deemed significant at P < 0.05 corrected.

k indicates number of voxels within each cluster.