Skip to main content
. 2011 Jul;49(8):2185–2198. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.02.045

Table 2.

Performances (mean (SD) Min–Max) in time-based prospective memory tasks. Times are generally in milliseconds and accuracy in percentage of correct answers. ‘Average time between two space bar presses’ is a measure of performance in time-based ‘PM trials’, and is given in seconds (ideal time between two presses: 30 s). Significant differences between patients and controls appear in bold font (performance accuracy in time-based PM trials refers to average delay between two space bar presses). RT: reaction times; PM: prospective memory; OGonly: performance in ongoing task trials in the phase where they performed alone (before a prospective memory instruction has been given); OGPM: performance in ongoing task trials in the phase where they are mixed with PM task; PM trials: only performance in prospective memory trials is considered.

All patients n = 45 Controls n = 107 Patients vs. controls (Mann–Whitney tests)
Time-based PM pictures
 Accuracy in ‘OGonly’ 89.2 (9.3) 65–100 92.0 (5.4) 80–100 U = 2038; z = −1.04; p = 0.300
 RT in ‘OGonly’ 1306 (339) 809–2267 1067 (197) 590–1640 U = 1334;z = −3.96;p < 0.001
 Accuracy in ‘OGPM’ 85.6 (7.8) 62.1–96.0 87.6 (3.7) 74.4–94.8 U = 2125; z = −0.65; p = 0.518
 RT in ‘OGPM’ 1163 (286) 803–2072 987 (167) 605–1351 U = 1580;z = −2.93;p = 0.003
 Average time between two space bar presses 34.207 (9.796) 16.979–52.582 32.935 (9.579) 10.655–72.386 U = 1400; z = −0.36; p = 0.718
Time-based PM words
 Accuracy in ‘OGonly’ 98.0 (4.0) 80–100 98.9 (2.7) 80–100 U = 2035; z = −1.32; p = 0.188
 RT in ‘OGonly’ 817 (320) 522–2102 635 (130) 385–973 U = 1390;z = −3.66;p < 0.001
 Accuracy in ‘OGPM’ 89.9 (8.5) 50.8–98.8 91.8 (3.5) 79.4–97.2 U = 2009; z = −1.05; p = 0.293
 RT in ‘OGPM’ 930 (280.6) 596–1983 774 (158) 450–1278 U = 1452;z = −3.40;p = 0.001
 Average time between two space bar presses 33.625 (11.108) 11.394–70.175 30.147 (6.384) 11.336–56.837 U = 1156; z = −1.39; p = 0.164