Skip to main content
. 2011 Jul;49(8):2185–2198. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.02.045

Table 3.

Performances (mean (SD) Min–Max) in event-based prospective memory tasks. Times are in milliseconds and accuracy in percentage of correct answers. Significant differences between patients and controls appear in bold font. RT: reaction times; PM: prospective memory; ‘OGonly’: performance in ongoing task trials in the phase where they performed alone (before a prospective memory instruction has been given); ‘OGPM’: performance in ongoing task trials in the phase where they are mixed with PM task; ‘PM trials’: only performance in prospective memory trials is considered.

All patients n = 45 Controls n = 107 Patients vs. controls (Mann–Whitney tests)
Event-based PM pictures
 Accuracy in ‘OGonly’ 90.3 (10.6) 40–100 94.3 (5.2) 80–100 U = 1824;z =  −2.26;p = 0.024
 RT in ‘OGonly’ 1248 (364) 708–2659 1131 (230) 632–1794 U = 1476;z = −3.60;p < 0.001
 Accuracy in ‘OGPM’ 91.7 (11.9) 40–99.6 95.8 (2.6) 87.1–99.6 U = 1871;z = −1.98;p = 0.047
 RT in ‘OGPM’ 1271 (330) 816–2103 1066 (200) 618–1592 U = 1479;z = −3.58;p < 0.001
 Accuracy in ‘PM trials’ 83.5 (30.3) 0–100 93.0 (13.2) 13.3–100 U = 2135; z = −0.79; p = 0.432
 RT in ‘PM trials’ 1085 (416) 604–2177 879 (257) 499–1644 U = 1394;z = −3.30;p = 0.001
Event-based PM words
 Accuracy in ‘OGonly’ 95.4 (9.6) 60–100 97.3 (4.3) 80–100 U = 1949; z = −0.11; p = 0.910
 RT in ‘OGonly’ 1037 (399) 598–2279 816 (177) 489–1251 U = 1302;z = −3.10;p = 0.002
 Accuracy in ‘OGPM’ 92.3 (12.7) 42.7–99.6 95.9 (6.9) 49.6–99.6 U = 1530;z =  −2.05;p = 0.041
 RT in ‘OGPM’ 1200 (348) 709–2277 974 (215) 516–1832 U = 1177;z = −3.68;p < 0.000
 Accuracy in ‘PM trials’ 76.6 (24.4) 0–100 78.3 (21.5) 0–100 U = 1941; z = −0.13; p = 0.893
 RT in ‘PM trials’ 1288 (375) 706–2316 1102 (336) 649–2331 U = 1234;z =  −2.92;p = 0.003