Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Oct;203(4):330.e1–330.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.05.014

Table 3.

Risk of IUGR by Previa Type and Resolution

IUGR (%) AOR* (95% CI) p Resolved Previa (%) Persistent Previa (%) IUGR in Persistent Previa (%) AOR (95% CI) p
Any Previa (n = 1665) (Second Scan Available 1002) 103 (6.5%) 1.0 (0.8–1.2) 0.33 837 (83.5%) 165 (16.5%) 21 (13.9%) 1.4 (0.8–2.3) 0.23
Complete Previa (n = 392) (Second Scan Available 229) 32 (8.7%) 1.4 (0.9 – 2.0) 0.23 135 (59.0%) 94 (41.0%) 15 (20.2%) 1.6 (0.7–3.5) 0.23
Partial Previa (n = 332) (Second Scan Available 208) 19 (5.9%) 0.9 (0.6 – 1.4) 0.43 168 (80.8%) 40 (19.2%) 0 - 0.23
Marginal Previa (n = 941) (Second Scan Available 565) 52 (5.8%) 0.8 (0.6 – 1.1) 0.11 534 (94.5%) 31 (5.5%) 1 (4.3%) 0.5§ (0.1–4.2) 0.56
*

Reference Group: Patients with no previa, n=57015, rate of IUGR 7.2% (see Table 2). Adjusted for black race, diabetes, preeclampsia, and single umbilical artery.

Reference Group: Patients with resolved previa.

Adjusted for single umbilical artery

§

Adjusted for preeclampsia