Skip to main content
. 2011 Jun 2;11:32. doi: 10.1186/1471-213X-11-32

Table 4.

Principal results of the correlation analyses of individual landmarks.

Males Females
Landmark I II III IV I II III IV

1 -0.22 0.08 -0.19 0.17 0.24 0.28 0.16 -0.06
2 -0.52 0.38 -0.46 0.25 0.66 0.21 0.05 -0.05
3 0.74 0.08 0.38 0.10 0.38 0.35 0.36 0.18
4 -0.28 -0.66 -0.31 0.24 0.13 -0.58 -0.28 0.03
5 -0.15 0.39 0.14 0.15 0.15 0.25 0.06 0.13
6 -0.45 0.07 -0.56 0.09 0.23 -0.54 -0.62 -0.04
7 -0.47 -0.19 -0.22 0.03 -0.27 0.35 -0.17 -0.30
8 -0.12 -0.20 0.16 0.04 -0.02 0.05 0.14 -0.05
9 0.28 0.62 0.05 0.23 -0.09 0.73 0.06 -0.04
10 0.60 0.06 0.40 0.03 0.20 0.74 0.31 0.11
11 -0.21 0.37 -0.40 0.15 0.24 -0.61 -0.33 -0.17

Principal results of the correlation analyses between X and Y coordinates of each landmark. A correlation analysis was performed between each pair of coordinates within males and females separately. The mean of the values of each coordinate corresponding to each line for each group (I-IV) was used in the analysis. r value for each correlation analysis is shown. Significant values (p < 0.05) are bold-faced and italicized.