Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011 Jan 13;81(1):305–312. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.11.019

Table 2.

Summary of registration differences between different systems (n: number of comparisons)

Absolute value of difference of registration shifts (mm); mean±SD (range)
Subsets of the comparisons
of registration results
Treatment site LR dimension
ΔLR
SI dimension
ΔSI
AP dimension
ΔAP
Three-dimension
ΔLR+ΔSI+ΔAP
TomoTherapy vs. the three Head&neck (n=9) 1.7±1.5 (0.6-5.4) 2.3±1.4 (0.5-4.9) 1.6±1.3 (0.4-3.1) 3.8±1.2 (2.5-6.2)
software systems Prostate (n=12) 1.3±1.0 (0.1-3.1) 1.6±1.4 (0.0-5.1) 2.7±2.3 (0.2-6.3) 3.9±2.0 (0.8-6.8)

Elekta vs. the three Head&neck (n=9) 2.1±1.6 (0.4-5.0) 1.4±0.7 (0.2-2.8) 2.5±0.9 (1.4-4.0) 3.8±1.4 (2.0-6.0)
software systems Prostate (n=12) 0.5±0.4 (0.0-1.3) 1.4±0.8 (0.0-2.7) 0.9±0.6 (0.1-1.8) 1.9±0.6 (0.9-2.8)

Varian vs. the three Head&neck (n=9) 3.6±3.2 (1.2-8.6) 3.3±1.0 (1.6-4.4) 2.6±0.6 (1.1-3.2) 6.1±2.0 (3.4-9.2)
software systems Prostate (n=9) 1.3±1.1 (0.2-3.2) 2.6±1.5 (0.5-4.9) 1.5±0.8 (0.5-2.8) 3.5±1.3 (1.1-5.0)

All clinical results vs. the Head&neck (n=27) 2.5±2.3 (0.4-8.6) 2.3±1.3 (0.2-4.9) 2.3±1.0 (0.4-4.0) 4.6±1.8 (2.0-9.2)
three software systems* Prostate (n=33) 1.0±0.9 (0.0-3.2) 1.8±1.3 (0.0-5.1) 1.7±1.6 (0.1-6.3) 3.1±1.7 (0.8-6.8)

Complete comparison Head&neck (n=54) 2.6±2.1 (0.1-8.6) 1.7±1.3 (0.0-4.9) 1.8±1.1 (0.1-4.0) 4.1±1.9 (1.1-9.2)
between each other Prostate (n=66) 1.1±1.0 (0.0-4.6) 2.1±1.7 (0.0-6.6) 2.0±1.8 (0.1-6.9) 3.5±2.0 (0.2-8.3)
*

Registration results from treatment systems are compared with the results from three software systems for all the cases. This is the union of the three subsets (i.e., TomoTherapy vs. softwares, Elekta vs. softwares, and Varian vs. softwares) of the comparisons.

All the results from different systems are compared each other. It includes the comparison between different software systems too.