Skip to main content
. 2011 May 17;27(14):1915–1921. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr303

Table 4.

Performance comparison on simulated datasets between drFAST-DP, drFAST-CT and Bowtie where error threshold is set to three mismatches

Dataset Mapper Time (min) Map locations Reads mapped (%)
Set 1 drFAST-DP 88 364 601 231 100
drFAST-CT 75 363 472 241 100
Bowtie v = 3 60 56 407 732 99.4
Bowtie n = 3 101 252 735 117 99.4

Set 2 drFAST-DP 42 118 053 818 100
drFAST-CT 45 113 349 741 100
Bowtie v = 3 45 23 365 015 99.4
Bowtie n = 3 50 111 931 387 99.4

Set 3 drFAST-DP 47 215 274 860 100
drFAST-CT 50 215 261 940 100
Bowtie v = 3 48 28 321 746 99.4
Bowtie n = 3 75 137 015 425 99.4

Values in bold show alignments with 100% sensitivity, higher value implies more sensitivity in the reported alignment.