Table 2.
Author | Sample size | Findings |
---|---|---|
Han et al. (2003) | 19 with CDR = 0; 20 with CDR = 0.5 | 40% ↓ in CSF sulfatide for CDR 0.5 vs. CDR 0.0. No difference in phosphatidylinosital (PI). |
Using sulfatide/PI ratio, 90% sensitivy & 100% specificy. | ||
Satoi et al. (2005) | 16 AD, 14 NC, 13 ALS. Among AD: 6 had a CDR = 0.5–1 (mild); 4 had a CDR = 2 (moderate); and 5 had a CDR = 3 (severe) | ↑ Mean ceramide in AD vs. NC (P < 0.01). ALS was elevated but not sig different from NC. Among AD, CDR = 2 had ↑ ceramide vs. mild (CDR = 0.5–1) or severe (CDR = 3) dementia. |
NC Normal control, AD Alzheimer’s disease, ALS Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, CDR Clinical Dementia Rating Scale