Skip to main content
. 2011 Apr 28;3(4):26. doi: 10.1186/gm240

Table 4.

Genomic studies of outcome in classical Hodgkin lymphoma

Technique Number of cases Material HRS microdissection HRS cell-related gene signatures associated with worse outcome ME-related gene signatures associated with worse outcome Reference
GEP 29 Paraffin-embedded tissue No Cell cycle Macrophages, T cells [78]
RT-PCR array 52 Paraffin-embedded tissue No G2/M transition, G1 phase, chaperone pathway, MAPK pathway, apoptosis Monocytes, macrophages, T cells [76]
GEP 282 Paraffin-embedded tissue No Cell cycle, apoptosis, IFR4 Macrophages [77]
GEP 63 Frozen fresh tissue No BCR signalling, apoptosis, cell metabolism Stroma remodeling [49]
GEP 130 Frozen fresh tissue No HRS cell related genes Macrophages, angiogenic cells, monocytes [68]
aCGH 53 Frozen fresh tissue Yes Gains of 16p (ABCC1) NA [81]
aCGH 27 Paraffin-embedded tissue Yes 4q27 loss (IL2/IL21), 17p12 loss, 19q13.3 gain (BCL3/RELB) NA [82]

aCGH, array comparative genomic hybridization; BCR, B-cell receptor; GEP, gene-expression profile; HRS, Hodgkin and Reed-Sternberg (cell); MAPK, mitogen activated protein kinase; ME, microenvironment; SNP, single-nucleotide polymorphism.