Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Psychiatr Serv. 2011 Jul;62(7):740–746. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.62.7.740

Table 3.

Multivariate linear regression predicting toughness among 1,051 participants in the California Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System surveya

Predictor B 95% CI
Female (reference: male) −.70 −1.15 to −.24
Race (reference: white)
    Black .53 −.69 to 1.75
    Asian .56 −.73 to 1.84
    Other −2.03 −3.60 to −.47
Hispanic origin (reference: non-Hispanic) .75 .08 to 1.42
Age .02 .01 to .03
Unable to go to doctor because of costb −.33 −1.02 to .35
Education
  High school diploma versus no diploma .23 −.24 to .70
  Some college versus high school diploma −1.41 −2.14 to −.68
  College degree versus some college −1.40 −2.02 to −.78
  Advanced degree versus college degree −1.09 −1.54 to −.63
  Depression symptomsc .09 .03 to .15
a

R2=.13, df=1,039. Toughness was assessed using the Tough Image Scale; possible scores range from 4 to 20, with higher scores indicating greater toughness.

b

Indicator of lower socioeconomic status

c

Assessed using the Patient Health Questionnaire 9-item depression scale (PHQ–9); possible scores range from 0 to 27, with higher scores indicating greater depression.

p<.01