TABLE 2.
Logistic Regression of Last Sex Condom Use at 3 Months and 6 Months
| HIV positive | HIV negative | HIV unknown | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Correlates of condom use at last sex act |
OR (95% Cl) condom use at 3 mosa (n = 111) |
OR (95% Cl) condom use at 6 mos (n = 120) |
OR (95% Cl) condom use at 3 mos (n = 165) |
OR (95% Cl) condom use at 6 mos (n = 163) |
OR (95% Cl) condom use at 3 mos (n = 97) |
OR (95% Cl) condom use at 6 mos (n = 88) |
| Sex worker | ||||||
| Yes | 1.00 (0.32–3.14) | 1.32 (0.29–5.93) | 0.58 (0.22–1.51) | 0.22 (0.06–0.77)* | 1.06 (0.31–3.56) | 1.34 (0.37–4.93) |
| Treatment | ||||||
| Women | 0.94 (0.33–2.69) | 7.27 (1.64–32.23)* | 1.68 (0.67–4.18) | 1.72 (0.61–4.84) | 1.41 (0.41–4.80) | 5.03 (1.26–20.11)* |
| Condom negotiation—3 months | 8.64 (3.70–20.17)* | … | 11.51 (5.21–25.46)* | … | 7.95 (3.38–18.72)* | … |
| Communication with Partners about Sex Risk—3 months | 0.41 (0.09–1.94) | … | 2.56 (0.68–9.65) | … | 0.38 (0.06–2.33) | … |
| Self-efficacy in Sexual | ||||||
| Assertiveness—3 months | 0.45 (0.17–1.23) | … | 0.89 (0.39–2.04) | … | 0.57 (0.19–1.69) | … |
| Sexual | ||||||
| Coercion Index—3 months | 1.61 (0.81–3.22) | … | 0.90 (0.48–1.70) | … | 1.25 (0.49–3.19) | … |
| Condom negotiation—6 months | … | 19.78 (5.89–66.39)* | … | 20.18 (7.71–52.84)* | … | 11.16 (3.90–31.96)* |
| Communication with Partners about Sex Risk—6 months | … | 1.19 (0.16–8.84) | … | 6.49 (1.34–31.44)* | … | 2.00 (0.23–17.82) |
| Self-efficacy in Sexual | ||||||
| Assertiveness—6 months | … | 2.28 (0.57–9.18) | … | 0.96 (0.41–2.21) | … | 1.30 (0.40–4.21) |
| Sexual | ||||||
| Coercion Index—6 months | … | 3.02 (1.08–8.45)* | … | 0.72 (0.32–1.63) | … | 1.38 (0.52–3.68) |
Note.
a
Due to missing data on variables of interest, the analytic sample is greatly reduced.
*
p<.05.