Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Jul 5.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Med Genet A. 2003 Jan 15;116A(2):111–116. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.10074

TABLE III.

Comparison of Language Performance at Baseline and at Treatment for Each Language Measure*

Test Base line Treatment Difference P-value (two-tailed) Average score and
(range) for 5 year-olds
Change from
5 to 6 years
TOPS
  TOPS, 12 weeks 14.4 20.9 6.5 0.0107 41 (37 to 44) 8.5 points
  TOPS, 24 weeks 14.4 19.5 5.1 0.0513 41 (37 to 44) 8.5 points
CELF-R expressive subtestsa
  Formulating 8.2 11.2 3.0 0.2215 23–27 (9 to 38) 13.5 points
  Sentences
  Recalling Sentences 12.2 14.0 1.8 0.2326 43–46 (32 to 58) 6.5 points
  Sentence Assembly 0.4 1.0 0.6 0.2080 0 (0 to 3) 3.5 points
CELF-R receptive subtestsa
  Oral Directions 4.3 3.3 −1.0 0.6042 6–7 (3 to 13) 5 points
  Word Classes 1.2 3.2 2.0 0.1543 7–8 (2 to 14) 13 points
  Semantic Relationships 3.0 4.0 1.0 0.5538 3 (0 to 9) 6.5 points
*

Baseline and treatment values are group average raw score performance (n=5). The statistical significance of the difference in baseline and treatment performance is determined by a paired t-test. Indexes of clinical significance, i.e., average performance and the range in raw scores for 5-year-olds, and the average improvement in raw score performance as children age from 5 to 6 years old, are provided.

a

CELF-R subtests administered only at baseline and at 24 weeks.