Skip to main content
. 2010 Nov-Dec;31(10):1853–1860. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A2246

Table 3:

QUADAS tool

Item Yes No Unclear
1) Was the spectrum of patients representative of the patients who will receive the test in practice? ( ) ( ) ( )
2) Were selection criteria clearly described? ( ) ( ) ( )
3) Is the reference standard likely to correctly classify the target condition? ( ) ( ) ( )
4) Is the time period between reference standard and index test short enough to be reasonably sure that the target condition did not change between the 2 tests? ( ) ( ) ( )
5) Did the whole sample or a random selection of the sample receive verification using a reference standard of diagnosis? ( ) ( ) ( )
6) Did patients receive the same reference standard regardless of the index test result? ( ) ( ) ( )
7) Was the reference standard independent of the index test (ie, the index test did not form part of the reference standard)? ( ) ( ) ( )
8) Was the execution of the index test described in sufficient detail to permit replication of the test? ( ) ( ) ( )
9) Was the execution of the reference standard described in sufficient detail to permit its replication? ( ) ( ) ( )
10) Were the index test results interpreted without knowledge of the results of the reference standard? ( ) ( ) ( )
11) Were the reference standard results interpreted without knowledge of the results of the index test? ( ) ( ) ( )
12) Were the same clinical data available when test results were interpreted as would be available when the test is used in practice? ( ) ( ) ( )
13) Were uninterpretable/intermediate test results reported? ( ) ( ) ( )
14) Were withdrawals from the study explained? ( ) ( ) ( )