Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Jul 5.
Published in final edited form as: J Intellect Disabil Res. 2004 Sep;48(Pt 6):531–539. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2004.00621.x

Table 1.

Diagnosis of 183 relatives of 183 probands with intellectual disability (ID) by relationship type

Relatives with psychotic illness
Probands with ID
Analyses* P-values
Relative type Schizophrenia n (%) Affective disorder n (%) Relative type n Male Scenario (1) Scenario (2)
All 121 (66%) 62 (34%) All 183 95 (52%) <0.00001 0.005
First degree
Parent 49 (64%) 28 (36%) Offspring 77 39 (51%) 0.011 0.128
 Mother 39 17 56 29 (52%)
 Father 10 11 21 10 (48%)
Sibling 32 (63%) 19 (37%) Sibling 51 27 (53%) 0.05 0.229
 Sister 18 11 29 18 (46%)
 Brother 14 8 22 9 (41%)
Offspring 2 (67%) 1 (33%) Parent 3 2 (67%)
Second degree
Aunt/uncle 30 (68%) 14 (32%) Nephew/niece 44 23 (52%) 0.011 0.079
 Maternal 21 9 30 14 (50%)
 Paternal 9 5 14 9 (56%)
Niece/nephew 8 (100%) 0 Uncle/aunt 8 4 (50%) 0.004 0.011
 Maternal 4 0 4 4 (100%)
 Paternal 4 0 4 0
*

One-tailed binomial tests were used to determine whether there was an excess proportion (P) of ID proband pairs where the relative had schizophrenia. Two possible scenarios were assessed: (1) assuming cumulative incidences of hospitalization for schizophrenia and affective disorder were equal (P = 0.50), and (2) assuming cumulative incidence of hospitalization for schizophrenia was greater than that for affective disorder (P = 0.5658), as recorded for first admission rates in 1943 (Penrose 1991).