Table 3.
Association between obesity, hsCRP, and subclinical atherosclerosis -MESA (2000–2002).
Odds Ratio | β-coefficient | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
CAC>0 | CIMT (>75th percentile) | CAC score (log CAC + 1) | Maximum CIMT (mm) | |
Total Population Age, gender, race adjusted | ||||
Non-obese/hsCRP<2 | 1 (ref) | 1 (ref) | 0 (ref) | 0 (ref) |
Non-obese/hsCRP≥2 | 1.18 (1.00 – 1.40) | 1.34 (1.11 – 1.62) | 0.12 (−0.05 – 0.29) | 0.27 (0.15 – 0.38) |
Obese/hsCRP<2 | 1.51 (1.29 – 1.76) | 1.63 (1.36 – 1.95) | 0.48 (0.33 – 0.64) | 0.48 (0.37 – 0.58) |
Obese/hsCRP≥2 | 1.51 (1.32 – 1.74) | 2.17 (1.86 – 2.54) | 0.45 (0.31 – 0.59) | 0.66 (0.57 – 0.76) |
MESA JUPITER population* Age, gender, race adjusted | ||||
Non-obese/hsCRP<2 | 1 (ref) | 1 (ref) | 0 (ref) | 0 (ref) |
Non-obese/hsCRP≥2 | 1.11 (0.85 – 1.47) | 1.35 (0.99 – 1.83) | 0.10 (−0.20 – 0.40) | 0.37 (0.18 – 0.55) |
Obese/hsCRP<2 | 1.68 (1.26 – 2.22) | 1.43 (1.05 – 1.95) | 0.63 (0.32 – 0.93) | 0.50 (0.31 – 0.69) |
Obese/hsCRP≥2 | 1.28 (1.00 – 1.64) | 2.33 (1.78 – 3.05) | 0.47 (0.20 – 0.74) | 0.68 (0.51 – 0.85) |
MESA JUPITER population* Fully adjusted** | ||||
Non-obese/hsCRP<2 | 1 (ref) | 1 (ref) | 0 (ref) | 0 (ref) |
Non-obese/hsCRP≥2 | 1.04 (0.79 – 1.38) | 1.31 (0.96 – 1.80) | 0.01 (−0.28 – 0.31) | 0.34 (0.15 – 0.52) |
Obese/hsCRP<2 | 1.44 (1.07 – 1.94) | 1.28 (0.93 – 1.77) | 0.44 (0.13 – 0.75) | 0.40 (0.21 – 0.59) |
Obese/hsCRP≥2 | 1.01 (0.78 – 1.31) | 2.10 (1.58 – 2.80) | 0.20 (−0.08 – 0.48) | 0.54 (0.37 – 0.72) |
MESA JUPITER population (N=2,083): Men age ≥50 and women ≥60 with LDL-C <130 mg/dL, not on lipid-lowering therapy, without diabetes, triglycerides ≤500 mg/dL, and creatinine ≤2 mg/dL
Fully adjusted model: Adjusted for age, gender, race, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, smoking, LDL-C, HDL-C, triglycerides, anti-hypertensive medications
β-coefficient should be interpreted as the absolute difference between each category and the reference category.