Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Jul 6.
Published in final edited form as: Sociol Q. 2010;51(3):408–435. doi: 10.1111/j.1533-8525.2010.01177.x

Table 4.

Odds Ratios from Logit Regression Models Predicting College Women’s Number of Dates and Boyfriend Status

Gone on more than six dates since entering college Has had boyfriend since entering college
Model 1 Model 2 Model 1 Model 2
Campus percent women .967* .973* .955** .959*
Individual Characteristics
Sophomore 2.342*** 2.318*** 1.906** 1.892**
Junior 3.976*** 4.223*** 3.567*** 3.664***
Senior 4.171*** 4.405*** 5.499*** 5.639***
Black .443+ .564 .684 .816
Asian .961 .952 .326** .328**
Other race .534 .612 .759 .818
Religious service attendance 1.132 1.086 .746** .725**
Traditionalist sex attitudes .972 .974 .994 .994
Campus Characteristics
Campus in Northeast .779 .821 1.113 1.147
Campus has <= 5,000 students .570* .566* 1.140 1.132
Greek life .569 .616 .536* .583+
Private college 1.417 1.468 .575 .602
Conservative Protestant college 1.184 .970 .408* .366**
College acceptance rate 1.011* 1.012* 1.018** 1.019**
Percent residential students .990 .990 1.004 1.004
Attractiveness of Potential Partners
Attitudes toward campus men .925** .947*
Model Fit Statistics
−2 log likelihood 1185.743 1171.715 890.067 885.404
Pseudo R-square .108 .119 .111 .115
+

p < .10

*

p < .05

**

p < .01

***

p < .001

Notes: Reference groups are freshman, White, and public college. Data are weighted to reflect the regional distribution of college students. Standard errors are adjusted to account for clustering within colleges. N = 986.