Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Aug 25.
Published in final edited form as: Prostate. 2011 Feb 25;71(14):1538–1547. doi: 10.1002/pros.21370

Table 2.

Association between ten SNPs in RNASEL and prostate cancer, stratified by Gleason score

SNP rs# Best-fitting model Minor allele frequency, controls N = 1267 Minor allele frequency, cases with Gleason score ≤ (3 +4) N = 1102 OR (95% CI) Minor allele frequency, cases with Gleason score ≥ (4 +3) N = 202 OR (95% CI) Nominal p-value
rs12723593 Trend 0.29 0.32 1.14 (1.00 – 1.28) 0.31 1.10 (0.88 – 1.39) 0.82
rs635261 Trend 0.38 0.36 0.92 (0.81 – 1.03) 0.37 0.96 (0.77 – 1.19) 0.70
rs12729828 Dominant 0.14 0.16 1.10 (0.91 – 1.32) 0.14 0.93 (0.65 – 1.31) 0.34
rs627839 Dominant 0.45 0.48 1.15 (0.96 – 1.38) 0.49 1.19 (0.85 – 1.68) 0.84
rs11807829 Dominant 0.34 0.32 0.91 (0.77 – 1.07) 0.32 0.85 (0.63 – 1.15) 0.67
rs627928 Recessive 0.44 0.45 1.19 (0.99 – 1.44) 0.47 1.06 (0.75 – 1.51) 0.53
rs486907 Dominant 0.37 0.36 0.91 (0.77 – 1.08) 0.33 0.72 (0.53 – 0.98) 0.13
rs56250729 Dominant 0.007 0.01 1.82 (1.00 – 3.31) 0.01 1.86 (0.68 – 5.07) 0.97
Gly59Ser (no rs#) Dominant 0.008 < 0.01 0.62 (0.29 – 1.33) < 0.01 0.32 (0.04 – 2.44) 0.54
rs682585 Dominant 0.38 0.39 1.07 (0.91 – 1.27) 0.41 1.08 (0.79 – 1.47) 0.98

Note: Four cases for whom Gleason score is unknown were excluded from stratified analyses.

OR: Odds ratio adjusted for 5-year age groups; CI: Confidence Interval;

p-value is Chi square test with 1 degree of freedom, testing the difference between risk estimates for lower- vs. higher-Gleason score groups.