Skip to main content
. 2011 Jun;29(3):183–190. doi: 10.3329/jhpn.v29i3.7864

Table 2.

Comparison of outcome variables

Variable Isoleucine-added ORS group (n=25) Control ORS group (n=25) Difference between mean (95% CI) p value
Stool output (g)—day 1 560±240 563±409 -3.0 (-189,183) 0.94
Stool output (g)—day 2 407±284 515±316 -108 (-285, 71) 0.23
Stool output (g)—day 3 388±261 653±446 -265 (-509, −20) 0.035
ORS intake (mL)—day 1 410±169 564±301 -154 (-288, −18) 0.04
ORS intake (mL)—day 2 330±245 401±226 -71 (-212, 70) 0.23
ORS intake (mL)—day 3 312±233 454±260 -142 (-312, 28) 0.09
Duration (hours) of diarrhoea 74±38 75±42 -1 (-17, 25) 0.96

Figures represent mean±SD.

CI=Confidence interval;

ORS=Oral rehydration solution;

SD=Standard deviation