Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Jul 13.
Published in final edited form as: J Am Chem Soc. 2011 Jun 16;133(27):10582–10586. doi: 10.1021/ja2046028

Table 2.

syn-Diastereo- and enantioselective carbonyl crotylation from the aldehyde oxidation level.a

graphic file with name nihms-301079-f0018.jpg
Entry Product Ligand Yield [%] ee [%] syn:anti
1 graphic file with name nihms-301079-t0019.jpg A 76 88 12:1
2 graphic file with name nihms-301079-t0020.jpg A 80 93 19:1
3 graphic file with name nihms-301079-t0021.jpg A 71 88 ≥20:1
4 graphic file with name nihms-301079-t0022.jpg B 91 90 ≥20:1
5 graphic file with name nihms-301079-t0023.jpg B 75b 93 11:1
6 graphic file with name nihms-301079-t0024.jpg A 56b,c 90 ≥20:1
7 graphic file with name nihms-301079-t0025.jpg A 71b 91 ≥20:1
8 graphic file with name nihms-301079-t0026.jpg A 66 84 ≥20:1
9 graphic file with name nihms-301079-t0027.jpg A 53b,c,d,e 84 ≥20:1
10 graphic file with name nihms-301079-t0028.jpg A 50b,d,e 84 ≥20:1
a

Ligand A = (R)-DM-SEGPHOS, Ligand B = (R)- SEGPHOS. Yields are of isolated material. Diastereoselectivity was determined through 1H NMR analysis of crude reaction mixtures. Enantiomeric excess was determined by chiral stationary phase HPLC analysis. See Supporting Information for details.

b

250 mol% 1.

c

THF

d

7 mol% catalyst.

e

72 hours.