Table 7.
THPI exposure measurea | n | %>LOD | Original algorithm |
Adjusted algorithm |
||
βb | P-value | βb | P-value | |||
24-h conc., μg l−1 | 130 | NAc | 0.0001 | 1.0 | 0.0307 | 0.08 |
24-h mass, μg | 130 | NAc | −0.0035 | 0.84 | 0.0284 | 0.14 |
Mass, first-morning, Day 1, μg | 140 | 61.4 | −0.011 | 0.63 | 0.0411 | 0.12 |
Conc., first-morning, Day 1, μg g−1 creatinine | 140 | 61.4 | 0.0016 | 0.94 | 0.0498 | 0.04 |
Excretion rate, overnight (Day 0 to Day 1), μg h−1 | 117 | 59.8 | −0.015 | 0.56 | 0.0367 | 0.15 |
Conc., concentration; LOD, limit of detection; NA, not applicable.
Urinary THPI levels previously reported in Hines et al. (2008).
The estimated regression coefficient and P-value were computed using MLE via PROC NLMIXED with person treated as a random effect. The data were left-censored at the LOD. The log-normal distribution was specified in the model. Use of MLE for treating censored data was not feasible for the 24-h urine measurements because several samples had been summed to create the 24-h value; instead, values below the LOD were replaced with LOD/2, the samples summed, and the β and P-value estimated via the PROC MIXED procedure with person treated as a random effect.
The percentage of days where all samples comprising the summed 24-h total had THPI levels below the LOD was 24% for airblast and 55% for hand spray.