Table 3.
Spearman correlation between the subject-specific arithmetic mean and the individual and aggregate ratings by industry and assessment round
Industry/round | Mean correlation (range) based on individual ratersa,b (n = 6) | Correlation (95% CI) based on aggregate ratingsa,c |
||
Group (n = 6) | Industrial hygienists (n = 3) | Occupational physicians (n = 3) | ||
Foundry (n = 72) | ||||
OH round | 0.60 (0.45–0.81) | 0.64 (0.48–0.76) | 0.66 (0.50–0.77) | 0.63 (0.46–0.75) |
OH/IQ round | 0.66 (0.56–0.70) | 0.77 (0.65–0.85) | 0.78 (0.67–0.86) | 0.70 (0.56–0.80) |
Textile (n = 74) | ||||
OH round | 0.41 (0.36–0.46) | 0.50 (0.31–0.65) | 0.49 (0.30–0.65) | 0.47 (0.27–0.63) |
OH/IQ round | 0.39 (0.32–0.47) | 0.49 (0.30–0.65) | 0.45 (0.25–0.62) | 0.49 (0.30–0.65) |
CI, confidence interval; n, number of subjects.
aEvaluated across 20 imputed data sets.
Based on ordinal scale (1–4).
Aggregate ratings calculated as the arithmetic mean of the ratings from the specified raters. Based on continuous scale (1–4).