Table 2.
Design adjusted only | Fully adjusted | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
n a | ORb | 95%CI | n | AORb,d | 95%CI | |
BMI | ||||||
Categorical | ||||||
Underweight versus Normal | 1,042 | 1.99 | 0.99–4.01 | 1,037 | 2.11 | 1.03–4.32 |
Overweight versus Normal | 1.08 | 0.78–1.51 | 1.07 | 0.76–1.51 | ||
Obese versus Normal | 1.42 | 0.96–2.11 | 1.31 | 0.86–2.00 | ||
Continuousc | ||||||
17 versus 24 | 580 | 4.02 | 1.83–8.80 | 578 | 4.31 | 1.94–9.54 |
19 versus 24 | 2.70 | 1.54–4.73 | 2.84 | 1.61–5.01 | ||
29 versus 24 | 462 | 1.39 | 1.10–1.76 | 459 | 1.42 | 1.10–1.84 |
34 versus 24 | 1.95 | 1.22–3.11 | 2.01 | 1.20–3.39 |
aHighest and lowest 1% of BMI values excluded
bAdjusted for frequency matching by race and birth month
cOdds ratios calculated from beta values of logistic models with a continuous linear BMI term
dAdjusted for parity, marital status, sleep, and weight gain during prgenancy