Skip to main content
. 2010 Jun 9;15(6):689–699. doi: 10.1007/s10995-010-0619-2

Table 2.

Late entry into antenatal care by ethnic background, as assessed by logistic regression (odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals)

Moroccan Turkish Cape Verdean Dutch Antilles Surinamese-Creole Surinamese-Hindustani
Model 1: Unadjusted 4.16 (2.93–5.89) 2.06 (1.41–3.01) 2.76 (1.76–4.33) 3.61 (2.28–5.70) 3.45 (2.01–5.91) 1.40 (0.74–2.64)
Model 2: Adjusted for need: perceived health of mother 4.36 (3.07–6.19) 2.32 (1.60–3.36) 2.82 (1.81–4.40) 3.90 (2.48–6.14) 3.61 (2.12–6.15) 1.53 (0.82–2.84)
Model 3: Adjusted for enabling variables: educational level, having a paid job 2.61 (1.78–3.83) 1.36 (0.91–2.02) 1.82 (1.14–2.88) 2.35 (1.45–3.79) 2.45 (1.66–4.88) 0.99 (0.52–1.87)
Model 4: Adjusted for predisposing variables: age, parity, household arrangement, planned pregnancy, pregnancy concern 3.36 (2.23–5.05) 1.63 (1.05–2.54) 2.06 (1.25–3.39) 2.53 (1.53–4.20) 2.40 (1.34–4.33) 1.10 (0.57–2.13)
Model 5: Adjusted for behavioural variables: intake folic acid, maternal smoking, alcohol use 2.37 (1.56–3.61) 1.27 (1.04–2.33) 1.97 (1.22–3.15) 2.65 (1.64–4.28) 2.68 (1.54–4.68) 1.08 (0.57–2.06)
Model 6: Adjusted for predisposing, behavioural, enabling and need variables 1.74 (1.07–2.85) 0.95 (0.57–1.58) 1.65 (0.96–2.82) 1.80 (1.04–3.13) 2.04 (1.10–3.78) 0.75 (0.38–1.50)