Table 2.
Rates of recovery of inoculated PV1 from a sediment sample using indirect methodsa
| Method | Elution buffer | Concn method (reference) | Total (flow 1) |
Elution and concnb recovery rate (%) | Extraction and RT-qPCR (flow 2) |
No. of samples | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. of copies detected/no. of inoculated copies | Recovery rate (%) |
No. of copies detected/no. of inoculated copies | Recovery rate (%) |
|||||||
| GM | GSD | GM | GSD | |||||||
| A | Glycine-NaOH | Filtration (5) | 1.9 × 106/1.1 × 108 | 1.8 | 0.17 | 1.8 | 1.7 × 108/1.1 × 108 | 165 | 0.06 | 3 |
| B | Glycine-NaOH | Filtration (12) | 5.7 × 106/1.1 × 108 | 5.4 | 0.53 | 5.4 | 1.2 × 108/1.1 × 108 | 112 | 0.20 | 9 |
| C | TE + Laureth-12 | Filtration (12) | 6.5 × 105/1.1 × 108 | 0.61 | 0.11 | 0.61 | 1.4 × 108/1.1 × 108 | 135 | 0.05 | 3 |
| D | Glycine-NaOH | PEG precipitation | 0/1.1 × 108 | — | — | Unknown | 0/1.1 × 108 | — | — | 3 |
| E | TE + Laureth-12 | PEG precipitation | 1.9 × 105/1.1 × 108 | 0.18 | 0.11 | 0.18 | 1.1 × 108/1.1 × 108 | 106 | 0.02 | 3 |
GM, geometric mean; GSD, geometric standard deviation; —, not detected.
Recovery rates in the elution and concentration steps were calculated on the basis of the assumption that the recovery rate for the extraction and RT-qPCR steps was 100%.