Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2010 Nov;67(11):1168–1178. doi: 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2010.146

Table 4.

Diagnostic concordance of best subset of ACDS items with DSM-IV/ACDS narrowly-defined and broadly-defined diagnoses of adult ADHD using several different scoring rules (n = 345)1

Prevalence
Concordance
Scoring rules (number
of items endorsed) 2
DSM-IV/ACDS
ADHD
Positive on the
dichotomized
prediction scale
χ2 SEN3 SPEC3 PPV3 NPV3 Κ3 AUC3
% (SD) % (SD) Est (SD) Est (SD) Est (SD) Est (SD) Est (SD)


I. Four-item scales
  A. Narrowly-defined
 1–4 3.6 (18.6) 24.2 (42.8) 70.0* 99.6 (6.3) 78.6 (41.0) 14.9 (35.6) 100.0 (0.0) .21 (0.4) .89
 2–4 3.6 (18.6) 12.0 (32.5) 27.6* 96.2 (19.1) 91.2 (28.3) 29 (45.4) 99.8 (4.5) .41 (0.5) .94
 3–4 3.6 (18.6) 4.4 (20.5) 1.2 88.1 (32.4) 98.7 (11.3) 72.6 (44.6) 99.5 (7.1) .79 (0.4) .93
 4 3.6 (18.6) 3.0 (17.1) 0.8 66.0 (47.4) 99.4 (7.7) 80.8 (39.4) 98.7 (11.3) .72 (0.4) .83
  B. Broadly-defined
 1–4 7.7 (26.7) 19.8 (39.8) 41.1* 99.8 (4.5) 86.8 (33.8) 38.8 (48.7) 100.0 (0.0) .50 (0.5) .93
 2–4 7.7 (26.7) 8.8 (28.3) 2.6 96.7 (17.9) 98.5 (12.2) 84.5 (36.2) 99.7 (5.5) .89 (0.3) .98
 3–4 7.7 (26.7) 5.4 (22.6) 5.9* 65.6 (47.5) 99.6 (6.3) 93.2 (25.2) 97.2 (16.5) .75 (0.4) .83
 4 7.7 (26.7) 0.9 (9.4) 22.6* 10.6 (30.8) 99.9 (3.2) 90.7 (29.0) 93.0 (25.5) .18 (0.4) .55
II. Executive functioning sub-scales
  A. Narrowly-defined
 1–2 3.6 (18.6) 15.6 (36.3) 38.4* 89.4 (30.8) 87.1 (33.5) 20.7 (40.5) 99.5 (7.1) .30 (0.5) .88
 2 3.6 (18.6) 3.2 (17.6) 0.3 66.9 (47.1) 99.2 (8.9) 75.8 (42.8) 98.8 (10.9) .70 (0.5) .83
  B. Broadly-defined
 1–3 7.7 (26.7) 14.4 (35.1) 21.7* 98.0 (14.0) 92.6 (26.2) 52.6 (49.9) 99.8 (4.5) .65 (0.5) .95
 2–3 7.7 (26.7) 7.6 (26.5) 0.0 87.0 (33.6) 99.0 (9.9) 88.3 (32.1) 98.9 (10.4) .87 (0.3) .93
 3 7.7 (26.7) 0.9 (9.4) 22.5* 11.0 (31.3) 99.9 (3.2) 91.0 (28.6) 93.1 (25.3) .18 (0.4) .55
*

The prevalence estimate based on the scoring rule applied to the subset of items differs significantly from the DSM-IV/ACDS prevalence estimate at .05 level using a two-sided test

1

As screened positive cases and sub-threshold cases were over-sampled from a larger initial sample in selecting respondents to be administered the clinical follow-up interview, the data for all 345 respondents were weighted to adjust for the over-sampling. The percentages reported in this table are based on analysis of these weighted data.

2

The scoring rules all use unweighted counts of symptoms endorsed to define predicted cases. The entries in this column are for the number of symptoms required to define a predicted case. The four-item scales in Part I of the table have different items for narrowly-defined and broadly-defined ADHD. The items for narrowly-defined ADHD include difficulty prioritizing work, trouble planning ahead, difficulty sustaining attention, and cannot work unless a deadline. The items for broadly-defined ADHD include difficulty prioritizing work, cannot complete work in allotted time, makes careless mistakes, and difficulty sustaining attention. The executive functioning sub-scales in Part II of the table delete the inattention items from the Part I scales (difficulty sustaining attention in the scales for both narrowly-defined and broadly-defined cases and cannot work unless a deadline in the scale for narrowly-defined cases), resulting in only 2 items in the narrowly-defined and 3 in the broadly-defined sub-scales.

3

SEN: sensitivity; SPEC: specificity; PPV: positive predictive value; NPV: negative predictive value; Κ: Cohen’s Κ; AUC: area under the receiver operating characteristic curve.