Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Eat Behav. 2010 Feb 17;11(3):197–200. doi: 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2010.02.001

Table 1.

Sample Characteristics, Descriptive Statistics, and Bivariate Correlations

Mean (SD) Range

Age in years 24.1 (5.2) 18–40

BMI 25.7 (4.6) 16.7–40.5

Some College Experience 97% (n=64) --

Total Self-Descriptors 25.3 (11.3) 7–52

Total Self-Schemas 17.0 (9.3) 4–47

 Positive Self-Schemas 12.2 (6.9) 2–35

 Negative Self-Schemas 1.6 (2.3) 0–9

 Neutral Self-Schemas 3.3 (4.5) 0–28

Interrelatedness 0.17 (0.09) 0.02–0.40

Fat Self-Schema 27% (n=18) --

EDI Bulimia 1.4 (2.2) 0–9

EDI Body Dissatisfaction 8.6 (6.8) 0–27

EDI Drive for Thinness 5.2 (5.2) 0–21

Binge Eating Scale 10.2 (6.8) 0–24

MEIM 3.3 (0.5) 2.2–4.0

Generational Distance
 1st Generation 17% (n=11) --
 2nd Generation 48% (n=32) --
 ≥ 3rd Generation 35% (n=23) --

EDI Body Dissatisfaction EDI Drive for Thinness EDI Bulimia Binge Eating Score

BMI .26* .04 .003 .12

# Positive Self-Schemas −.25* −.16 −.10 −.12

# Negative Self-Schemas .32** .35** .34** .34**

Interrelatedness .15 .03 .16 .25*

Fat Self-Schemaa .55** .50** .37** .42**

Note.

*

p < .05,

**

p <0.01;

a

Fat self-schema is a dichotomous variable, point-biserial correlations are reported.