Table 4.
Agencies | Month 1 (%) | Month 2 (%) | Month 3 (%) | z-test (vs. Healthy Start 98.8%) |
Follow-up screening rates |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
TTT agencies with screening rates comparable to healthy start | |||||
TTT Agency #1-6 | 100 | 100 | 100 | n/a | n/a |
TTT Agency #7 | 94 | 87 | 100 | n/a | n/a |
TTT Agency #8 | 64 | 71 | 100 | n/a | n/a |
TTT Agency #9 | 90 | 89 | 95 | z = 0.35 | n/a |
TTT Agency #10 | 67 | 67 | 83 | z = 1.34 | n/a |
TTT agencies with screening rates significantly lower than healthy start | |||||
TTT Agency #11 | 51 | 85 | 88 | z = 3.99 | 93% |
TTT Agency #12 | 60 | 54 | 63 | z = 5.46 | 80% |
TTT Agency #13 | 81 | 74 | 53 | z = 10.01 | Not available |
TTT Agency #14 | 47 | 51 | 44 | z = 11.07 | 100% |
TTT Agency #15 | 17 | 10 | 23 | z = 17.62 | Not available |
TTT Agency #16 | 0 | 100 | 14 | z = 10.84 | 100% |
The six programs which did not have high screening rates during the immediate 3 month post-implementation phase were asked to provide follow-up data. Additional data was received from 4 of these 6 programs