Skip to main content
. 2011 Jul;66B(4):468–477. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbr049

Table 4.

Associations of Standardized Physical Performance Scores With Subsequent Institutionalization Stratified by Positive Psychological Characteristics

Stratified by OR of institutionalization per 1 SD increase in physical performance score (95% CI)
N Model 1 Model 2 Model 3
Mastery
    Below median (0–12) 585 0.28 (0.12–0.65) 0.43 (0.17–1.08) 0.53 (0.21–1.36)
    Above median (13–20) 859 0.63 (0.26–1.52) 0.53 (0.19–1.49) 0.49 (0.16–1.53)
    p Value .08 .09 .10
Self-efficacy
    Below median (22–42) 654 0.47 (0.25–0.89) 0.60 (0.28–1.25) 0.63 (0.30–1.33)
    Above median (43–60) 793 0.30 (0.10–0.89) 0.48 (0.12–2.00) 0.49 (0.11–2.19)
    p Value .58 .62 .60
Investment in independence
    Below median (0–42) 633 0.37 (0.13–1.06) 0.50 (0.16–1.58) 0.50 (0.15–1.61)
    Above median (43–56) 755 0.57 (0.29–1.15) 0.51 (0.22–1.20) 0.52 (0.21–1.28)
    p Value .32 .34 .34

Notes: Model 1: Adjusted for age and gender. Model 2: Model 1 plus indicators of baseline health status (number of chronic conditions and functional limitations score). Model 3: Model 2 plus education and partner status. p Values from likelihood ratio tests of interaction. CI = confidence interval; OR = odds ratio.

HHS Vulnerability Disclosure