Skip to main content
. 2010 Dec 3;29(4):422–436. doi: 10.1007/s00774-010-0241-9

Table 1.

Parameters by micro-CT analysis of 4th lumbar (L4) and tibia epiphysis

Parameter Baseline (14 weeks) Treatment (29 weeks)
Sham-Walking Sham-Inactive OVX-Walking OVX-Inactive
BV/TV (%)
 L4 41.3 (1.4) 27.0 (1.5) 26.2 (1.5) 23.8 (1.0)a 19.6 (1.3)abc
 Tibia 22.1 (3.6) 17.3 (1.2) 13.8 (1.6)a 6.0 (0.6)ab 3.6 (0.4)ab
Tb.Th (μm)
 L4 71.4 (2.3) 69.1 (1.4) 66.8 (2.1) 67.5 (1.2) 64.3 (1.9)abc
 Tibia 56.0 (0.7) 61.0 (1.4) 55.6 (1.8) 54.3 (1.8) 48.6 (1.6)a
Tb.N (mm−1)
 L4 5.80 (0.07) 3.99 (0.15) 3.93 (0.11) 3.57 (0.11) 3.09 (0.1)abc
 Tibia 3.87 (0.24) 2.76 (0.16) 2.49 (0.23) 1.14 (0.08)ab 0.71 (0.07)ab
Tb.Sp (μm)
 L4 102.1 (3.2) 182.2 (10.2) 187.5 (8.6) 213.7 (9.1) 260.7 (15.1)abc
 Tibia 204.4 (15.9) 304.6 (23.4) 347.2 (48.7) 828.6 (61.5)ab 1373.2 (112.8)abc

Values are the median (SE); n = 6/group. Within the treatment groups, aP < 0.05, versus Sham-Walking; bP < 0.05, versus Sham-Inactive; cP < 0.05, versus OVX-Walking by Bonferroni’s multiple comparison test. Except for the BV/TV (Tibia) and Tb.Th (L4 and Tibia), all values in the Sham-Walking group are significantly different from the Baseline values, P < 0.05