Skip to main content
. 2011 Jul;9(4):323–329. doi: 10.1370/afm.1278

Table 1.

Participants’ Characteristics and Patient-Reported Coordination Scores

Specialty Care Use (No. of Visits)a
Characteristics Low (0–9) n (%) High (10+) n (%) Total, N (%) Coordination Score Mean (SD)b
Total 1,552 (76) 499 (24) c 2,051 (100) 77.7 (21) d
Sex
    Female 910 (59) 259 (52) 1,169 (57) 76.2 (22)
    Male 642 (41) 240 (48) d 882 (43) 79.6 (19) c
Race
    White 1,312 (85) 461 (93) 1,773 (87) 78.2 (20)
    Nonwhite 231 (15) 35 (7) 266 (13) 74.1 (23)
Age, y
    65–69 158 (10) 43 (8) 201 (10) 75.3 (22)
    70–74 243 (16) 68 (14) 311 (15) 77.7 (20)
    75–79 330 (21) 121 (24) 451 (22) 79.5 (20)
    80–84 379 (24) 128 (26) 507 (25) 77.0 (21)
    85+ 442 (29) 139 (28) d 581 (28) 77.7 (21)
Chronic disease
    CAD only 564 (36) 231 (46) 795 (39) 77.2 (21)
    Diabetes only 697 (45) 132 (27) 829 (40) 78.5 (21)
    Both CAD and diabetes 291 (19) 136 (27) d 427 (21) 77.1 (21) d
Self-rated health
    Excellent/very good 321 (21) 75 (16) 396 (20) 82.6 (19)
    Good 669 (44) 195 (40) 864 (43) 78.2 (20)
    Fair/poor 519 (35) 213 (44) d 732 (37) 74.4 (22)
RxRisk
    Low 539 (35) 125 (25) 664 (33) 77.4 (21)
    Medium 549 (35) 148 (30) 697 (34) 77.9 (21)
    High 460 (30) 222 (45) d 682 (33) 77.8 (20)
Any hospitalizations
    Yes 305 (20) 252 (51) 557 (27) 76.4 (21)
    No 1,247 (80) 247 (49) 1,494 (73) 78.2 (21)

CAD = coronary artery disease; RxRisk = medication-based risk adjustment measure.36

a χ2 Test compared percentages between low and high specialty care use groups.

b One-way analysis of variance compared mean coordination across covariate groups.

cP <.01.

dP <.001.