Skip to main content
. 2011 Jul;9(4):323–329. doi: 10.1370/afm.1278

Table 2.

Association Between Continuity and Coordination

Variables Difference in Mean Coordination (95% CI) PValue
Independent, unadjusteda
    Continuity, raw score/SDb 2.22 (1.3 to 3.1) <.001
    High specialty care use 0.57 (−1.5 to 2.6) .59
Independent, adjusteda
    Continuity, raw score/SDb 2.21 (1.2 to 3.2) <.001
    High specialty care use 1.23 (−1.0 to 3.4) .27
Covariates
    Female −2.71 (−4.3 to −1.1) .001
    White 3.97 (1.3 to 6.7) .004
    Age (referent: 65–69), y .03
        70–74 3.63 (−0.1 to 7.4)
        75–79 5.46 (1.6 to 9.3)
        80–84 2.89 (−1.0 to 6.8)
        85+ 4.67 (1.0 to 8.3)
    Chronic disease (referent: CAD) .27
        Diabetes 1.96 (−0.4 to 4.4)
        Both CAD and diabetes 1.08 (−1.7 to 3.8)
    Self-rated health (referent: good) <.001
        Excellent/very good 4.55 (2.1 to 7.0)
        Fair/poor −3.42 (−5.4 to −1.5)
    RxRisk score (referent: medium) .53
        Low −1.21 (−3.5 to 1.1)
        High 0.03 (−2.3 to 2.4)
    Any hospitalizations −1.64 (−3.6 to 0.4) .11

CAD = coronary artery disease; RxRisk = medication-based risk adjustment measure.36

a Excluding 77 respondents because of missing race, self-rated health, or primary care physician data.

b Interpretation: mean predicted change in coordination associated with increase of 1 SD (mean continuity=0.55; SD=0.32).