Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Calcif Tissue Int. 2011 May 10;89(1):43–52. doi: 10.1007/s00223-011-9492-2

Table 2.

Regression of micro-CT bone indices against volume fraction

Bone index vs. volume fraction Control Regenerate
Apparent density vs. BV/TV
 Intercept −113.91 −132.58
 Slope 994.92 913.45
 R2 0.96 0.99
 P≤ 0.000 0.000
Material density vs. BV/TV
 Intercept 823.17 581.56
 Slope 44.63 222.55
 R2 0.05 0.62
 P≤ 0.526 0.007
Tb. BS/BV vs. Tb. BV/TV
 Intercept 16.52 14.73
 Slope −19.09 −14.86
 R2 0.69 0.83
 P≤ 0.003 0.000
Connectivity density vs. Tb.BV/TV
 Intercept 2.73 14.96
 Slope 19.16 −6.55
 R2 0.46 0.03
 P≤ 0.032 0.632
Trabecular number vs. Tb.BV/TV
 Intercept 0.64 2.27
 Slope 3.15 −1.04
 R2 0.80 0.25
 P≤ 0.001 0.138
Trabecular thickness vs. Tb.BV/TV
 Intercept 0.10 −0.13
 Slope 0.31 0.85
 R2 0.71 0.77
 P≤ 0.002 0.001
Trabecular separation vs. Tb.BV/TV
 Intercept 0.99 0.51
 Slope −1.77 −0.45
 R2 0.87 0.72
 P≤ 0.000 0.002