Skip to main content
. 2011 Apr 4;62(11):3917–3927. doi: 10.1093/jxb/err089

Table 2.

Summary of plant traits and variables for five spring barley genotypes indicating where significantly larger (↑) or smaller (↓) values were obtained relative to the other genotypes

Kenia (tall) Golden Promise (ari-e.GP) B83 (ari-e.GP) Westminster (sdw1) Derkado (sdw1)
Dry mass (g plant−1)
Total
Root ↑Ra ↓R ↓R
Leaf
Stem
Ear
Mass remobilization
Harvest Index
Nitrogen (g plant−1)
Total
Root
Leaf
Stem
Ear
N remobilization
N Harvest Index
Root investment
Coefficient a
Coefficient b
Root mass (% total)
Root N (g g−1 dry mass)
Root N (% total N)
Plant N/root mass (g g−1) ↑S ↑S ↑S ↓S ↓S
NUE
N uptake efficiency
N utilization efficiency
Overall NUE
a

R, in reduced nutrient treatment only; S, in standard nutrient treatment only. Nutrient supply in the reduced nutrient treatment was 50% of that in the standard nutrient treatment.