Skip to main content

View full-text article in PMC

. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Jul 12.

Published in final edited form as: J Sch Health. 2010 May;80(5):249–258. doi: 10.1111/j.1746-1561.2010.00498.x

Table 3.

Gender and School Type as Moderators of the Effects of Peer Group Self-Identification on Physical and Relational Aggression 1 Year Later (Model 2)

	Interaction Effects
	Relational Aggression	Physical Aggression
Peer Group × Gender	F (3,1558) = 0.78, p = 0.50	F (3,1588) = 0.55, p = 0.48
HRY × Gender b (SE_b)	0.08 (0.08)	−0.09 (0.13)
Elites × Gender b (SE_b)	0.09 (0.08)	−0.05 (0.14)
Others × Gender b (SE_b)	−0.04 (0.09)	0.08 (0.19)
Peer Group × School Type	F (3,1558) = 0.42, p = 0.74	F (3,1588) = 1.76, p = 0.19
HRY × School Type b (SE_b)	−0.06 (0.08)	0.11 (0.14)
Elites × School Type b (SE_b)	−0.10 (0.10)	0.26 (0.19)
Others × School Type b (SE_b)	−0.06 (0.10)	0.002 (0.23)

SE = Standard Error.

HRY, High-Risk Youth.

The interaction terms were added to the main effect model presented in Table 2.