Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Prev Sci. 2012 Aug;13(4):360–369. doi: 10.1007/s11121-011-0202-0

Table 4.

Intimate Partner Violence Means and Standard Deviations Using Construct and CTS Scores

T1 T2 T3 T4 T5 T6

Physical Aggression
Construct Scores (scale 0-3)
Men .18 (.26) .13 (.22) .10 (.19) .07 (.15) .07 (.15) .05 (.15)
Women .29 (.33) .18 (.26) .13 (.21) .09 (.17) .07 (.14) .07 (.13)
CTS Scores (scale 1-7)
Men 1.15 (.35) 1.06 (.14) 1.04 (.17) 1.06 (.21) 1.04 (.14) 1.03 (.13)
Women 1.23 (.43) 1.08 (.20) 1.05 (.18) 1.05 (.15) 1.03 (.11) 1.04 (.16)
Psychological Aggression
Construct Scores (scale 1-5)
Men 2.13 (.66) 2.01 (.67) 1.93 (.60) 1.92 (.64) 1.90 (.60) 1.86 (.63)
Women 2.20 (.68) 2.13 (.66) 2.06 (.57) 2.00 (.63) 1.97 (.61) 1.99 (.67)
CTS Scores (scale 1-7)
Men 1.91 (.77) 1.78 (.69) 1.65 (.64) 1.70 (.70) 1.62 (.58) 1.71 (.73)
Women 2.00 (.81) 1.85 (.70) 1.68 (.60) 1.69 (.63) 1.66 (.57) 1.73 (.74)

Note. Construct scores used contained self-, partner, and coder reports. CTS scores used were the mean of self- and partner reports.