Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev. 2011 May-Jun;31(3):193–197. doi: 10.1097/HCR.0b013e3181fc09b7

Table 1.

Subject characteristics

Dropped out after visit 1 (n=30) Analysis sample (available for followup; n=176) P valuea Among analysis sample: Physical activity level at baseline
Active 72.7% (n=128) Inactive 27.3% (n=48) P valueb
Age, y, mean (SD) 64.5 (6.4) 65.8 (6.0) .30 65.6 (5.8) 66.4 (6.6) .39
Female, % (n) 40.0 (12) 64.2 (113) .01 60.2 (77) 75.0 (36) .07
Education ≤high school, % (n) 80.0 (24) 77.8 (137) .79 80.5 (103) 70.8 (34) .17
Self-reported physician diagnosed, % (n) .57 .10
 COPD or emphysema 53.3 (16) 43.9 (79) 38.3 (49) 56.3 (27)
 Chronic bronchitis alone 30.0 (9) 32.2 (58) 35.2 (45) 25.0 (12)
 Asthma without COPD or CM 16.7 (5) 23.9 (43) 26.6 (34) 18.8 (9)
Nonrespiratory comorbid conditions, % (n) .45 .04
 0 23.3 (7) 25.0 (44) 29.7 (38) 12.5 (6)
 1 30.0 (9) 39.8 (70) 39.1 (50) 41.7 (20)
 2+ 46.7 (14) 35.2 (62) 31.3 (40) 45.6 (22)
Smoking status, % (n) .71 .02
 Current smoker 20.0 (6) 14.8 (26) 10.2 (13) 27.1 (13)
 Former smoker 56.7 (17) 56.8 (100) 59.4 (76) 50.0 (24)
 Never smoked 23.3 (7) 28.4 (50) 30.5 (39) 22.9 (11)
FEV1 % predicted, mean (SD) 81.5 (21.3) 85.4 (19.5) .31 86.6 (18.4) 82.4 (22.3) .25
FEV1/FVC, mean (SD) 0.62 (0.16) 0.65 (0.15) .28 0.66 (0.14) 0.63 (0.17) .20
VLA % affected, mean (SD) 40.2 (32.7) 25.6 (28.8) .02 20.4 (25.7) 39.3 (32) .0005
Physically inactive, % (n) 33.3 (10) 27.3 (48) .50 NA NA
a

difference between individuals included in the analysis and those who were lost to followup, assessed by t-test or χ2 analysis

b

difference between individuals who were physically active and inactive at baseline, assessed by t-test or χ2 analysis

Abbreviations: COPD, CM, FEV1, FVC, VLA