Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev. 2011 May-Jun;31(3):193–197. doi: 10.1097/HCR.0b013e3181fc09b7

Table 2.

Baseline characteristics of individuals with and without an increase in VLA disability at 1-year followupa

Baseline characteristic No increase in disability (80.1%, n=141) Increase in disability (19.9%, n=35) P valueb
Age, y, mean (SD) 65.6 (6.1) 66.7 (5.7) .33
Female, % (n) 61.7 (87) 74.3 (26) .16
Education ≤ high school, % (n) 76.6 (108) 82.9 (29) .42
Self-reported physician diagnosed .003
 COPD 36.9 (52) 68.6 (24)
 Chronic bronchitis 36.2 (51) 17.1 (6)
 Asthma 27.9 (38) 14.3 (5)
Nonrespiratory comorbid conditions, % (n) .70
 0 26.2 (37) 20.0 (7)
 1 39.7 (56) 40.0 (14)
 2+ 34.0 (48) 40.0 (14)
Smoking status .22
 Current smoker 13.5 (19) 20.0 (7)
 Former smoker 55.3 (78) 62.9 (22)
 Never smoked 31.2 (44) 17.1 (6)
FEV1 % predicted, mean (SD) 87.3 (18.9) 77.9 (20.4) .01
FEV1/FVC, mean (SD) 0.66 (0.15) 0.59 (0.16) .02
VLA % affected, mean (SD) 25.6 (30.3) 25.6 (22.1) .99
Physically inactive, % (n) 23.4 (33) 42.9 (15) .02
a

Increase in VLA disability defined as an increase in the proportion of VLAs affected by ≥10%

b

P-value from comparison of individuals with and without increases in disability using t-tests or χ2 analyses

Abbreviations: COPD, FEV1, FVC, VLA