Skip to main content
. 2011 Mar 24;66(2):149–156. doi: 10.1007/s11130-011-0219-3

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Behavior of the Abcg5−/− and the Abcg5+/+ mice in the EZM and TST. Mice were allowed to explore the EZM for 5 min. The time in zone in the open zone (OZ), the closed parts (CZ), the border-in (BI), the border-out (BO) (indicated in (c)) as well as the latency to enter the CZ (latency) did not differ between Abcg5+/+ and Abcg5−/− mice in the EZM (a). The frequency of entrance in CZ, OZ, BO and BI were not significantly different either (b). Immobility times in the TST are displayed as mean +/− SEM