Skip to main content
. 2011 Jul 12;183(10):1147–1154. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.101257

Table 3:

Variables associated with the risk of transition to injection drug use (n = 39) among the 197 participants of the Cedar Project in British Columbia, Canada, for whom follow-up information was available

Variable HR (95% CI)*
Unadjusted Adjusted
Interviewed in Prince George, BC 0.99 (0.53–1.85)
Female sex 1.98 (1.06–3.72) 1.03 (0.46–2.29)
Mean age at enrolment 1.03 (0.96–1.11)
Identifying as gay, lesbian, bisexual or two-spirited 1.97 (0.77–5.04)
At least one parent attended residential school 0.78 (0.41–1.48)
Ever placed in foster care 1.37 (0.67–2.81)
In a relationship during the past 6 mo 0.62 (0.30–1.31)
Ever experienced sexual abuse 1.24 (0.66–2.34)
Sexual assault in the past 6 mo 0.88 (0.12–6.40)
Lived on the street for ≥ 3 nights 0.97 (0.51–1.83)
Ever denied shelter because of drug use 0.95 (0.42–2.15)
Ever incarcerated overnight or longer 0.87 (0.47–1.64)
Ever attempted suicide 1.13 (0.58–2.19)
Ever practised self harm 0.64 (0.32–1.28)
History of mental illness 1.30 (0.65–2.62)
Involved in sex work in the past 6 mo 3.35 (1.75–6.40) 3.94 (1.45–10.71)
Inconsistent use of condoms with casual partner in the past 6 mo 0.96 (0.40–2.29)
Inconsistent use of condoms with regular partner in the past 6 mo 1.25 (0.67–2.36)
Inconsistent use of condoms with clients in the past 6 mo 2.69 (0.64–11.29)
Use of drugs with clients in the past 6 mo 2.51 (1.19–5.32)§ 0.64 (0.23–1.82)
History of sexually transmitted infection in the past 6 mo 2.01 (1.07–3.78) 1.72 (0.88–3.37)
Smoked crack cocaine daily in the past 6 mo 1.69 (0.89–3.19)
Smoked heroin daily in the past 6 mo 1.72 (0.53–5.59)
Smoked methamphetamine daily in the past 6 mo 1.22 (0.53–5.59)
Ever received treatment for addiction 1.37 (0.70–2.66)
Tried to access treatment for addiction in the past 6 mo 1.20 (0.62–2.31)
Received treatment with methadone in the past 6 mo 1.23 (0.17–8.97)

Note: BC = British Columbia, CI = confidence interval, HR = hazard ratio.

*

HR < 1.00 shows an effect size that is protective for the exposed group; HR > 1.00 indicates an effect size that is higher among members of the exposed group than members of the reference group.

Significant at p < 0.05.

Significant at p < 0.001.

§

Significant at p < 0.01.