Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Math Imaging Vis. 2011 May;40(1):20–35. doi: 10.1007/s10851-010-0240-4

Table 4.

The p-values for the cdf comparisons (overall and by group) of the pooled LCDM distances. The p-values for each type of alternative are adjusted by Holm’s correction method

p-values for cdf comparisons
Left Right
Pair 2-sided 1st<2nd 1st>2nd 2-sided 1st<2nd 1st>2nd
MDD, HR <.0001 <.0001 .0073 .0316 .0158 .6017
MDD, Ctrl <.0001 .5362 <.0001 <.0001 .0069 <.0001
HR, Ctrl <.0001 .4170 <.0001 <.0001 .0043 <.0001