Table 1.
Farm | Control | Albendazole | Percentage of reduction | CI 95% | Drench effectiveness | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
n | epg | n | epg | Lower | Upper | |||
A | 15 | 1977 | 15 | 713 | 64 | −5 | 88 | Resistant |
B | 10 | 570 | 13 | 23 | 96 | 86 | 99 | Suspicious |
C | 11 | 250* | 13 | 308 | −23 | −336 | 65 | Resistant |
D | 13 | 608 | 13 | 562 | 8 | −98 | 57 | Resistant |
E | 13 | 100* | 14 | 164 | −64 | −545 | 58 | Resistant |
F | 14 | 2593 | 12 | 296 | 89 | 64 | 96 | Resistant |
G | 15 | 1700 | 15 | 230 | 86 | 64 | 95 | Resistant |
*These flocks were 300 or more epg in the pre-treatment phase.