Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Jul 13.
Published in final edited form as: Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2011 Apr 14;107(1):42–49.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2011.03.004

Table 1.

Demographic Distribution of Participants Included Compared With Those Excluded for the Analyses of the Wheeze Outcomesa

Predictor variables Included (n = 279) Excluded (n = 448) P valueb
Mother’s age at pregnancy, mean ± SDc 24.99 ± 4.91 25.40 ± 4.92 .15
Prenatal demoralization, mean ± SDc 1.15 ± 0.64 1.15 ± 0.63 .83
Ethnicityd
   Dominican 166 (59) 307 (68) .02
   African American 113 (41) 141 (32)
Maternal educatione
   Less than high school 94 (34) 192 (43) <.01f
  High school diploma 90 (32) 139 (32) .18f
  Some college 95 (34) 113 (25)
Positive maternal history of asthmad 84 (30) 140 (31) .80
Maternal IgE >100 IU IgE/mLd 81 (29) 54 (31) .75
Child exposed to secondhand smoked 105 (38) 140 (31) .09
Child’s sex: maled 131 (47) 133 (46) .59
Wheeze phenotypes at the age of 5 yearse
  Transient 76 (27) 71 (34) .47f
  Late onset 21 (8) 9 (4) .14f
  Persistent 67 (24) 38 (18) .16f
  Nonwheeze 115 (41) 92 (44)
a

Data are presented as number (percentage) of participants unless otherwise specified.

b

P values refer to the difference between the participants selected for the analyses and those not selected. Similar findings were observed between included vs excluded for the analyses of total and specific IgE outcomes.

c

P value assessed by Mann-Whitney test.

d

P value assessed via a Pearson χ2 test.

e

P value assessed via a nominal regression.

f

Reference group was having completed some college and no wheeze, respectively.