Table 3.
ANOVA showing BBB scores.
| Time after contusion | Group 1: laminectomy N = 6 |
Group 2: contusion N = 7 |
Group 3: contusion + hNT2-6 N = 6 |
Group 4: contusion + hNT2-19 N = 9 |
Group 5: laminectomy + hNT-19 N = 5 |
Group 6: laminectomy +hNT2-6 N = 7 |
One way ANOVA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean (SEM) | Mean (SEM) | Mean (SEM) | Mean (SEM) | Mean (SEM) | Mean (SEM) | F-statistic, P value | |
|
| |||||||
| Baseline | 21.0 (0.00) | 21.0 (0.00) | 21.0 (0.00) | 21.0 (0.00) | 21.0 (0.00) | 21.0 (0.00) | NA |
| Day 1 | 16.67 (3.28) | 0.29 (0.10) | 0.58 (0.58) | 0.67 (0.32) | 21.0 (0.00) | 21.0 (0.00) | 73.0; P < .000 |
| Week 1 | 17.25 (2.71) | 4.36 (1.39) | 3.67 (1.41) | 2.83 (0.80) | 21.0 (0.00) | 21.0 (0.00) | 44.6; P < .000 |
| Week 2 | 17.75 (2.78) | 7.29 (1.37) | 6.00 (1.53) | 5.89 (1.07) | 21.0 (0.00) | 21.0 (0.00) | 27.4; P < .000 |
| Week 3 | 17.92 (2.62) | 7.71 (1.15) | 6.08 (1.58) | 7.28 (1.05) | 20.4 (1.34) | 20.5 (0.50) | 24.9; P < .000 |
| Week 4 | 18.83 (2.17) | 9.29 (0.65) | 7.75 (1.45) | 7.17 (1.41) | 21.0 (0.00) | 19.8 (0.99) | 23.6; P < .000 |
| Week 5 | 18.83 (2.17) | 9.29 (0.64) | 8.17 (1.45) | 7.28 (1.50) | 21.0 (0.00) | 20.6 (0.43) | 25.1; P < .000 |
| Week 6 | 18.83 (2.17) | 9.57 (0.57) | 8.92 (0.85) | 7.67 (1.53) | 21.0 (0.00) | 20.6 (0.43) | 25.9; P < .000 |
| Week 7 | 18.92 (2.08) | 9.86 (0.46) | 8.75 (1.03) | 7.28 (1.46) | 21.0 (0.00) | 21.0 (0.00) | 30.3; P < .000 |
| Week 8 | 18.92 (2.08) | 9.86 (0.46) | 8.50 (1.33) | 7.83 (1.45) | 21.0 (0.00) | 21.0 (0.00) | 27.3; P < .000 |
Post hoc analyses (Bonferroni):
Group 1 is significantly different than Groups 2, 3, 4 on all time points.
Group 2 is significantly different than Groups 1, 5, 6 on all time points.
Group 3 is significantly different than Groups 1, 5, 6 at all time points.
Group 4 is significantly different than Groups 1, 5, 6 at all time points.
Group 5 is significantly different than groups 2, 3, 4 on all time points.
Group 6 is significantly different than groups 2, 3, 4 on all time points.