Skip to main content
. 2009 Feb;7(1):37–45. doi: 10.1089/met.2008.0042

Table 5.

Logistic Regression Analysis with Metabolic Syndrome Prevalence as Defined by the ATP III–Modified Criteria as the Dependent Variable and Alcohol Intake as the Independent Variable

  Cases ORa (95% CI) ORb (95% CI)
Alcohol categoriesa
 Nondrinker 659 1.00   1.00  
 Occasional/light 66 0.95 0.70–1.28 1.06 0.76–1.48
 Moderate 216 1.06 0.88–1.28 1.11 0.90–1.38
 Heavy 169 1.32 1.06–1.64 1.54 1.19–2.06
Winec
 No 768 1.00   1.00  
 <1 drink/day 127 1.00 0.79–1.25 1.04 0.80–1.34
 >l–3 drink/day 147 1.511 0.97–1.51 1.43 1.11–1.85
 ≥3 drink/day 68 2.01 1.51–2.95 2.28 1.53–34.1
Beer
 No 864 1.00   1.00  
 <1 drink/day 175 0.93 0.76–1.14 0.97 0.77–1.22
 >l–3 drink/day 57 0.96 0.67–1.33 1.19 0.82–1.74
 ≥3 drink/day 14 0.91 0.49–1.71 1.13 0.54–2.36
Liquor
 No 979 1.00   1.00  
 <1 drink/day 40 1.58 1.04–2.39 1.39 0.86–2.25
 >l–3 drink/day 44 0.99 0.69–1.42 0.88 0.58–1.33
 ≥3 drink/day 47 1.12 0.78–1.61 0.88 0.57–1.36
a

Adjusted for age, kcal/day, smoking, physical activity, education level, income level, occupation, and cardiovascular disease; analyses by type of individual drink were mutually adjusted for other types of alcoholic drinks.

b

All above plus body mass index.

c

Rice wine and grape wine combined.

Note: ATP III–Modified, U.S. Third Report of the National Cholesterol Education Program, Adult Treatment Panel.