Table 6.
Type of Impairment | Level of Impairment | Underserved Trial Samples(2000–2002) | UrbantUnderserved Trial Sample (2000–2002) | Nonurban Underserved Trial Sample (2000–2002) | t-statistic or chi-square (P value) for urban/nonurban comparison |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Housework | F = 22.4 (P < 0.0001) | ||||
No difficulty | 46.2% (1.6%) | 35.5% (2.0%) | 55.4% (1.9%) | ||
Difficulty but no assistance | 11.5% (0.9%) | 13.8% (1.3%) | 9.6% (1.0%) | ||
Difficulty and assistance but could do without | 2.6% (0.4%) | 1.6% (0.5%) | 3.4% (0.6%) | ||
Could do with difficulty | 21.4% (1.1%) | 22.2% (1.6%) | 20.6% (1.5%) | ||
Could not do by self | 18.3% (1.2%) | 27.0% (1.7%) | 10.9% (1.2%) | ||
Meal preparation and cleanup | F = 31.7 (P < 0.0001) | ||||
No difficulty | 68.5% (1.6%) | 56.6% (2.0%) | 78.7% (1.6%) | ||
Difficulty but no assistance | 7.4% (0.7%) | 10.8% (1.0%) | 4.6% (0.8%) | ||
Difficulty and assistance but could do without | 1.3% (0.3%) | 1.3% (0.4%) | 1.4% (0.4%) | ||
Could do with difficulty | 13.2% (.9%) | 14.4% (1.3%) | 12.2% (1.1%) | ||
Could not do by self | 9.6% (0.9%) | 17.0% (1.4%) | 3.2% (0.6%) | ||
Personal care | F = 12.8 (P < 0.0001) | ||||
No difficulty | 79.9% (1.3%) | 72.4% (1.7%) | 86.4% (1.3%) | ||
Difficulty but noassistance | 8.5% (0.8%) | 10.8% (1.2%) | 6.5% (0.9%) | ||
Difficulty and assistance but could do without | 0.5% (0.2%) | 0.4% (0.2%) | 0.6% (0.3%) | ||
Could do with difficulty | 5.9% (0.6%) | 8.2% (1.1%) | 3.9% (0.7%) | ||
Could not do by self | 5.2% (0.6%) | 8.2% (1.1%) | 2.6% (0.6%) | ||
Other tasks | F = 7.7 (P < 0.0001) | ||||
No difficulty | 60.1% (1.6%) | 53.2% (2.2%) | 66.0% (1.9%) | ||
Difficulty but no assistance | 6.5% (0.7%) | 8.5% (1.1%) | 4.8% (0.8%) | ||
Difficulty and assistance but could do without | 2.2% (0.4%) | 2.0% (0.5%) | 2.3% (0.5%) | ||
Could do with difficulty | 10.8% (0.9%) | 11.0% (1.1%) | 10.7% (1.3%) | ||
Could not do by self | 20.4% (1.1%) | 25.4% (1.6%) | 16.2% (1.4%) |
Standard errors for the underserved sample are corrected for physician-level clustering. Standard errors for the MEPS data are corrected for complex survey sampling.
Trial data gathered at baseline for prior 3 months only. The data are converted to an annual measure by assuming that the annual usage rate is 4 times the prior 3-month rate.
The majority of the urban sample is of Latino descent while the majority of the nonurban sample is white and non-Latino.