Table 3.
Projected differences and power for statistical tests of secondary outcomes in the VIBES randomized, sham-controlled trial of low magnitude mechanical stimulation
| Outcomes | Treatment Group Comparison | Difference from Baseline to 2nd Year of follow-up in Treatment Group | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Difference | Power | Difference | Power | |
| Biochemical markers of Bone Turnover | ||||
| CTX | 20% | 84% | 20% | 90% |
| BSAP | 20% | 90% | 20% | 95% |
| P1NP | 20% | 95% | 20% | 98% |
| Musculoskeletal health | ||||
| Quadriceps isometric strength | 15% | 84% | 10% | 86% |
| Falls | 15% | 88% | 10% | 90% |
| Balance | ||||
| Mean velocity | 15% | 91% | 10% | 92% |
| Root mean square distance | 15% | 88% | 10% | 92% |
| Mean frequency | 10% | 88% | 7.5% | 83% |
| Centroid frequency | 10% | 86% | 7.5% | 82% |