Table 2.
Study, study type and country | Treatment, sample size and follow-up time | Confirmed diagnosis and time with Ménière's disease | Appropriateness of treatment | Key findings | Summary evaluative comments and overall quality |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Randomized controlled trials | |||||
| |||||
Body acupuncture versus Western medicine 15-day treatment | MD patients attending hospital for acute attack | No TCM pattern diagnosis used; set acupoints; TCM rationale provided | Total effectiveness rate: 74% versus 49% (P < .05) | Strengths of the study include: confirmed MD, random allocation to treatment groups, detailed overview and rationale of the treatments, graded outcome measurements and audiometric testing. The short length of follow-up limits the generalization of the results. | |
Zhang et al. [9] China | (i) Acupuncture: once a day for 2-3 days; if symptom relief, then every other day; | 69% versus 43% symptom control (P < .05) | |||
(ii) Western medicine: two drugs (Serc and Vitamin B3) and Vitamin B6 | |||||
(n = 76; I = 39; C = 37) | Unknown duration | Small, audiometrically confirmed, hearing change | |||
Follow-up: 15 days (end of treatment period) | Overall quality judgment: Good | ||||
| |||||
Scalp acupuncture and Western medicine versus Western medicine and vitamin B1 and B12 | MD confirmed by two medical committees | Set prescription without individualized diagnosis and treatment | Total effectiveness rate: 98% versus 89% (P < .05) | Strengths of the study include: confirmed MD, random allocation to treatment groups, detailed overview of the treatments, and graded outcome measurement. The chosen treatment approach is experimental, rather than a traditional TCM one. | |
Gao and Ni [10] China | (i) Acupuncture (or injected vitamins) once a day for 10 days as one course, total of three courses | 89% versus 27% symptom control (P < .001) | |||
(ii) Western medicine: once a day for 10 days, total of three courses | Up to 7 years | ||||
(n = 132; I = 58; C = 74) | 84% versus 49% hearing improvement (P < .001) | ||||
Follow-up: 2 years | Overall quality judgment: Good | ||||
| |||||
Acupuncture and drug treatment versus drug treatment | Unclear if the MD cases confirmed MD | Individualized diagnosis and prescription | Total effectiveness rate for Ménière's group: 91% versus 50% (NS, P > .05) | Strengths of the study include: random allocation to treatment groups, individualized diagnosis, detailed overview of the treatments, and graded (and quantitative) outcome measurement. Weakness in very small number of MD sample size, non-confirmation of MD diagnosis and short follow-up time. | |
(i) Acupuncture—key points; once daily (acute stage), once every 3 days (remission stage). | |||||
Fang [11]* China | (ii) Drug treatment (sibelium, 10 mg once daily for 30 days) | ||||
(n = 65; I = 36; C = 29; of which Ménière's I = 11; C = 4) | 1 day to 3 months (from dizziness) | 7 out of 11 versus none of controls dizziness cured | |||
Follow-up: 30 days | Overall quality judgment: Fair | ||||
| |||||
Non-randomized controlled trials | |||||
| |||||
Acupuncture versus Western medicine and vitamin | Unclear if confirmed MD | Treatment group has TCM diagnosis and individualized treatment; control group has set acupoints. | Total effectiveness rate: 100% versus 74% (P < .01) | Strengths include details over outcome measurement; length of follow-up; use of TCM pattern differentiation. Weaknesses include: lack of clarity over how patients are allocated to the two treatment groups; MD not confirmed; and limited detail over treatments (form or frequency). | |
(i) Acupuncture—key and specific points. | 60% versus 39% cured and no recurrence at 2 years (P < .01) | ||||
Yu and Shi [12] China | (ii) Western medicine (vitamin C and Luminal (an anti-convulsive drug) injection) | 1–7 years | 30% versus 8% outstanding improvement and no recurrence at 1 year | ||
No details given on daily frequency or number of sessions of acupuncture (n = 168; I = 86; C = 82) | Overall quality judgment: Fair | ||||
Follow-up: 2 years | |||||
Body acupuncture versus Chinese herbal medicine (for vertigo) | Patients with MD | No TCM pattern diagnosis used to choose acupoints | Total effectiveness rate: 99% versus 88% (P < .01) | Short report, but adequate details on MD confirmation, treatment points, appropriate 2:1 case: comparison subject ratio and explanation of set acupoint prescription. Lack of detail over how patients were allocated to the treatment and comparison group (non-random). | |
(i) Acupuncture: Two courses of 15 sessions 1 p day, with 5 day rest | 93% versus 60% “complete" response (P < .001) | ||||
Yan [13]* China | (ii) Chinese herbal medicine: Two courses of 15 sessions 1 p day, with 5 day rest | 102 patients had MD for ≤1 year, 135 1–5 years and 20 > 5 years | Set acupoint prescription | 99% versus 88% “complete" or “partial" response | |
n = 257; Ac = 189; Hb = 68 | 11% versus 49% recurrence rate (P < .001) (when not indicated) | ||||
Follow-up: 1 year | |||||
| |||||
Scalp and ear acupuncture versus body acupuncture | Confirmed MD by hospital | Set prescription without individualized diagnosis and treatment | Total effectiveness rate: 94% versus 73% (P < .01) | Strengths include details over acupuncture treatment and their rationales and outcome measurement. | |
Qin and Jia [14] China | (i) Scalp and ear acupuncture once per day for 10 days, plus patients (taught to) self-treat for 5 days. | 53% versus 33% cured (P < .01) | Weaknesses include: lack of follow-up; and lack of clarity over how patients are allocated to the treatment groups. | ||
(ii) Body acupuncture once a day for 10 days | Duration—no information | 27% versus 23% marked improvement | |||
(n = 102; I = 72; C = 30) | |||||
Follow-up: none | Overall quality judgment: Fair | ||||
| |||||
Pre-test, post-test design | |||||
| |||||
Acupuncture | Patients with MD in acute phase (all previously treated with Western medicine without effect) | Set prescription, needling one point (Gang Shen), based on clear rationale | Total effectiveness rate: 100% | Extensive details over treatment procedure and rationale are provided (Gang Shen is an experimental point for MD). But lack of detail over choice of participants and outcome measurement scale. | |
Li and Li [15] China | Once a day for 20 days | 77% acute symptom control after one treatment; 16% after two. | |||
n = 56 | Most patients needed only 7 sessions to experience benefit. | Overall quality judgment: Fair | |||
Follow-up: 1 year | Up to 8 years | ||||
| |||||
Li [16] China | Herbal medicine and ear acupuncture, for 2-60 days | Patients with MD according to explicit criteria | Individualised treatment following TCM principles for herbal medicine; ear acupuncture points set in conjunction with herbal medicine | Total effectiveness rate: 90% | Strengths include: clear diagnostic criteria, appropriate TCM principles and outcome measurement in relation to these principles and descriptions. But lack of detail over treatment duration or choice of participants. |
n = 90 | Up to 20 years | 72% cured | Note: this is predominantly a herbal approach with ear acupuncture as an adjunct. | ||
Follow-up: 1 year | 18% improved | Overall quality judgment: Good | |||
Scalp acupuncture plus herbal medicine Once daily acupuncture for 7 days; simple herbal tea (to continue tea for 1 year) | MD acute stage (hospitalized following acute attack) | TCM individualized diagnosis and treatment, with herbal remedy adjusted | Total effectiveness rate: 97% 18% outstanding effect | Strengths include: clarity over outcome measurement, TCM diagnosis and treatment and length of follow-up. | |
Dong and Zhou [17] China | n = 180 | 70% cured | |||
Follow-up: 1 year | Up to 10 years | 8% improved | Overall quality judgment: Good | ||
| |||||
Moxibustion at Du-20 | Patients with clinically confirmed MD | TCM individualized diagnosis with set acupoint | Total effectiveness rate: 100% | Use of standard diagnosis criteria and outcome measurement criteria for MD, appropriate acupoint with TCM rationale. (Note: treatment also included advice on diet and emotion) Overall quality judgment: Good | |
Sun and Li [18] China | Twice a day for 15 days | 75% cured | |||
n = 20 | Up to 2 years | 25% outstandingly improved | |||
Follow-up: 1 year | (Du-20) | ||||
| |||||
Post-test design | |||||
| |||||
Electro-acupuncture, acupuncture and moxibustion | MD patients who had auditory vertigo symptoms | One set point for acupuncture, another for moxibustion; other points added according to TCM diagnosis | Total effectiveness rate: 100% | Targets only cases with auditory vertigo syndrome. Detailed description of other Ménière's symptoms of cases; full explanation of potential role of acupuncture in treating Ménière's. | |
Dai and Liang [19]* China | One treatment daily for up 6 days (30 min application) | 70% “cured" | |||
n = 23 | 18% “excellent" | ||||
Follow-up: 1 year | Up to 17 years | ||||
| |||||
Acupuncture | MD—query over criteria | Individualized treatment following TCM principles | Total effectiveness rate: 90% | Strengths include: appropriate TCM principles. But lack of detail over treatment duration, choice of participants and diagnostic criteria for MD. | |
10 sessions for 1 month | 22% cured | ||||
Liu [20] China | n = 51 | Duration—no information | 69% improved | ||
Follow-up: 2 year | Overall quality judgment: Poor | ||||
| |||||
Moxibustion at Du-20 (over 2 hours), for up to three sessions 32 | Confirmed MD (Otol. Dept) | Du-20 is a good experiential point for dizziness. | Total effectiveness rate: 100% 100% symptom relief (8 from one session, 10 from two, and 14 after three). | Strengths include: MD confirmed by Otolaryngology Department, use of standard treatment duration, use of an appropriate (Du-20) treatment point and length of follow-up. | |
Chao [21] China | n = 32 | Not diagnosed according to TCM theory. | Weaknesses include: unclear sampling criteria, sole focus on one MD symptom (dizziness) and lack of control group. | ||
Follow-up: 2 years | average 9 years | Note: moxibustion only | No recurrence after 2 years. | Overall quality judgment: Fair | |
Electro-acupuncture | Patients with MD | Treatment according to TCM pattern diagnosis | Total effectiveness rate: 74% | Short article; in consequence, limited details on methods, except on acupuncture treatment. | |
Tian [22]* China | Two to three courses of 10 sessions daily, with 2 days rest between course (10–20 min application) | Fifty had MD for 1–5 years, 22 for >5 years | 50% “marked improvement" | ||
n = 72 | 24% “improved" | Overall quality judgment: Fair | |||
Follow-up period: 1 year | Treatment more effective in cases of shorter duration | ||||
| |||||
Acupoint injection at Du-20 | Patients with MD according to “book" of common diseases | Set, single point used, with TCM rationale | Total effectiveness rate: 100% | Clear diagnostic criteria with detailed treatment procedure. But duration of follow-up is not stated and lack of clarity over outcome measurement (causes of dizziness disappeared). | |
Bo [23] China | Once a day for 10 days, 1 day break, then another course of treatment (3–30 sessions in total) | 75% cured | |||
n = 88 | Overall quality judgment: Fair | ||||
Follow-up: not stated | Up to 3 years | 23% improved | |||
| |||||
Wang and Chen [24] China | Acupuncture points injection with Dansheng liquid on one side at one time plus scalp acupuncture | Patients with MD | Set prescription but based on good TCM treatment principles | Total effectiveness rate: 92% | Combined traditional and scalp needling plus points injection seems a potentially good treatment method, and based on TCM principles. While diagnosis is based on TCM principles, treatment is not individualized. Good detail on treatment procedures. |
Acupuncture with injection once a day, with scalp acupuncture every other day, for 10 days. 5-day break, second course of treatment | Up to 14 years | 62% cured | |||
n = 50 | 30% outstandingly improved | Overall quality judgment: Fair | |||
Follow-up: 2 years | |||||
| |||||
Body acupuncture | Patients with MD | Treatment according to TCM pattern diagnosis | Total effectiveness rate: 94% | Study report is from an abstract, translated from the original Chinese paper. Brief detail on methods is provided, with extensive detail on needling and TCM rationale. | |
Zhang [25]* China | Courses of 10 sessions with a 2-day rest between (30 min application) | 72% cured | |||
n = 18 | Up to 6 years. | ||||
Follow-up period: 2 years | 22% marked effect | Overall quality judgment: Fair | |||
Acupuncture | MD—query over criteria | TCM pattern differentiation | Total effectiveness rate: 100% | Lack of detail over choice of participants or diagnostic criteria for MD. While diagnosis is individualized, the treatment points are only for one TCM diagnosis pattern. It is unclear if the treatment is individualized. | |
Zhou [26] China | 3–15 sessions, once per day (average of 9) | ||||
n = 20 | Up to 8 years | 80% cured | Overall quality judgment: Poor | ||
Follow-up: 1 year | 20% improved | ||||
| |||||
Acupuncture | MD—query over criteria | Set acupoints based on explicit TCM rationale for point choice | Total effectiveness rate: 92% | Strengths include: explicit rationale for set acupoint prescription, based on TCM theory, and extensive details over treatment methods. Lack of clarity over how many courses were provided and diagnostic criteria. | |
Zhang [27] China | Once a day for 10 days, 5 day break, another course | 60% cured | |||
n = 60 | Up to 10 years | 30% outstandingly improved | Overall quality judgment: Poor | ||
Follow-up: 2 years | |||||
| |||||
Case series | |||||
| |||||
Body acupuncture, ear acupuncture and moxibustion (and, rarely, scalp acupuncture) | Patients with MD—with confirmed auditory tests | Treatment according to TCM pattern diagnosis | Total effectiveness rate: 100% | Very brief report on cases over 5-year period, with limited detail on outcome measurement (focus on vertigo). Strengths include: the use of audiometric tests (for auditory acuity) and extensive detail on needling and TCM treatment rationale. | |
Steinberger and Pansini [28]* ?Yugoslavia | Five treatments, once a day (30 min application) | ||||
n = 34 | 100% success for vertigo after 3 treatments | Overall quality judgement: Poor | |||
Follow-up period: unclear | |||||
| |||||
Body acupuncture | Patients with MD according to clinical symptoms | Set acupoint prescription, with extra points if tinnitus and deafness were severe | Total effectiveness rate: 93% | Reporting on 18-year case series of clinically confirmed MD cases. Short report, with limited but adequate detail on the acupuncture treatment. | |
Xu and Ge [29]* China | Courses of 10 sessions, once a day (20–30 min application) | 39% cured | |||
33% “marked" improvement | |||||
n = 75 | 18 had had MD for <1 year, 57 for ≥1 year | 21% improved | |||
Follow-up period: 1 year | On average, needed two treatment courses (range 1–5) | Overall quality judgment: Poor | |||
| |||||
Body acupuncture | Patients with MD, with a “sudden onset" of symptoms | Treatment according to TCM pattern diagnosis | Total effectiveness rate: 100% | Brief report on cases treated since 1975 with very limited detail, except on rationale and approach to treatment (and ways to improve the treatment). | |
Tian [30]* China | 10–15 treatments | 100% “cured" (Eight had alleviation of symptoms after four treatments; 13 after 7) | |||
n = 21 | |||||
Follow-up period: unstated | Overall quality judgment: Poor | ||||
Acupuncture | MD—query over criteria | Treatment following TCM principles, but only for the one symptom of dizziness | Total effectiveness rate: 99% | Strengths include: treatment based on appropriate TCM principles. But lack of detail over choice of participants or diagnostic criteria for MD, treatment not individualized, no standard course of treatment, and unclear length of follow-up | |
Song and Yi [31] China | Once a day until all symptoms disappear (mean n = 5; range 2 to >10) | Up to 15 years | 91% cured over short term | ||
n = 152 | 8% improved | Overall quality judgment: Poor | |||
Follow-up: unclear | |||||
| |||||
Acupuncture | Patients with MD at an acute stage | No TCM diagnosis differentiation or individualized treatment | Total effectiveness rate: 98% | Following appropriate TCM principles for treating two symptoms (dizziness and vomiting) of MD, but limited detail and no explicit follow-up mentioned. | |
Zhu [32] China | n = 51 | Up to 6 years | 64% cured | ||
Follow-up: not indicated | 32% outstanding effect | Overall quality judgment: Poor | |||
| |||||
Acupuncture | Patients with MD | Appropriate acupuncture at single point. No TCM pattern differentiation | Total effectiveness rate: 90% | The study reports on a large group of patients; the treatment provided is an integrated treatment for MD, but there is a lack of detail over the number of courses given. | |
Zhang and Shang [33] China | Once a day for 3 days (as one course) | 57% cured | |||
n = 286 | Up to 24 years | 28% outstanding effect | |||
Follow-up: 1 year | Overall quality judgment: Fair | ||||
| |||||
Body acupuncture and moxibustion | Patients with MD | Treatment according to TCM pattern diagnosis | Total effectiveness rate: 100% | Short report on cases treated over a number of years. Argues that Ménière's syndrome belongs to the category of “dizziness" in TCM. Strengths include one year follow-up and clear rationale for treatment. | |
Lu [34]* China | One treatment per day (30 min application); 2–14 daily treatments given (mean of 7.4) | Twenty-two patients had MD ≤10 years; eight for >10 | 87% cured | ||
n = 30 | 13% effective | ||||
Follow-up: 1 year | 30% symptom free after 1 year; 47% re-occurrence within 6 months | Overall quality judgment: Fair | |||
| |||||
Acupuncture plus moxibustion at Du-20 | MD—query over criteria | TCM pattern differentiation and treatment | Total effectiveness rate: 100% | Reporting on cases treated since 1988 for TCM diagnosis of dizziness. | |
Wang [35] China | Once a day for 7 days as one course of treatment | ||||
n = 30 | Up to 10 years | 97% cured | Overall quality judgment: Fair | ||
Follow-up: 2 years |
Asterisk indicated studies located from English language search. RCT: randomized controlled trial; CT: controlled trial; MD: Ménière's Disease; I: Intervention; C: Comparison/Control.